Fatigue Crack Growth in a Precipitation-Hardened Martensitic Stainless Steel: Influence of Ageing, Temperature and Loading History

Article Preview

Abstract:

The 15-5PH (precipitation-hardened) martensitic stainless steel is prone to embrittlement following ageing during service at temperatures between 300°C and 350°C. This results in an increase in strength and a decrease in elongation and fracture toughness. However little information is available on the consequences of long term ageing on fatigue crack growth resistance. In the present study this issue is precisely addressed at room temperature and 300°C, with different load ratio under constant amplitude loading and under variable amplitude loading.At room temperature, the results indicate a marginal effect of the load ratio, regardless of ageing conditions and temperature. While the Paris regime is not affected by ageing, a significant drop in the critical stress intensity value before unstable fracture is observed, reflecting a decrease in fracture toughness of the material with ageing. At 300°C, the FCGRs are higher than at room temperature for all ageing conditions. Variable amplitude loading tests carried out on differently-aged materials showed the same retardation effect.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 891-892)

Pages:

961-966

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] U.K. Viswanathan, S. Banerjee, and R. Krishnan, Mater. Sci. Eng. A104 (1988) 181.

Google Scholar

[2] R.D.K. Misra, G.Y. Prasad, T.V. Balasubramanian, P.R. Rao, Scripta Metall. 20 (1986) 713.

Google Scholar

[3] R. Viswanathan, ASM International, Metals Park, Ohio, USA (1989) 158.

Google Scholar

[4] K.C. Antony, J. Met. 15 (1963) 922.

Google Scholar

[5] J-H. Wu and C-K. Lin, Metall. Mater. Trans. A33 (2002) 1715.

Google Scholar

[6] J-H Wu and C-K. Lin, Mater. Sci. 38 (2003) 965.

Google Scholar

[7] J-H Wu and C-K. Lin, Mater. Trans. 44 (2003) 713.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Murayama, Y. Katayama and K. Hono, Metall. Mater. Trans. 30A (1999) 345.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Pommier, Int. J. Fatigue 25 (2003) 983.

Google Scholar

[10] R. Hamam, S. Pommier, Int. J. Fatigue 29 (2007) 1634.

Google Scholar

[11] Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth rates, ASTM E647, (1995).

Google Scholar