The Effect of Crack Growth Retardation when Comparing Constant Amplitude to Variable Amplitude Loading in an Aluminium Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

It has often been observed that the growth of short fatigue cracks under variable amplitude (VA) cyclic loading is not well predicted when utilising standard constant amplitude (CA) crack growth rate/stress intensity data (da/dN v DK). This paper outlines a coupon fatigue test program and analyses, investigating a possible cause of crack growth retardation from CA-only testing. Various test loading spectra were developed with sub-blocks of VA and CA cycles, then using quantitative fractography (QF) the sub-block crack growth increments were measured. Comparison of these results found that, after establishing a consistent uniform crack front using a VA load sequence, the average crack growth rate then progressively slowed down with the number of subsequent CA load cycles applied. Further fractographic investigation of the fracture surface at the end of each CA and VA sub-block crack growth, identified significant crack front morphology differences. Thus it is postulated that a variation or deviation from an efficient crack path is a driver of local retardation in short crack growth during CA loading. This may be a source of error in analytical predictions of crack growth under VA spectra loading that may need to be considered in addition to other potential effects such as less closure whilst cracks are small. For aircraft designers, using solely CA data for fatigue life predictions this may result in non-conservative estimates of total crack fatigue life, producing unexpected failures or an increased maintenance burden.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 891-892)

Pages:

948-954

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] ASTM E647-05 - Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates, ed: American Society for Testing and Materials, (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] Forth, S. C., Newman Jr, J. C., and Forman, R. G., On generating fatigue crack growth thersholds, International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 25, pp.9-15, (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(02)00066-x

Google Scholar

[3] Liao, M., Dislocation theory based short crack model and it's application for aircraft aluminium alloys, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 77, pp.22-36, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.07.022

Google Scholar

[4] Newman Jr, J. C., Phillips, E. P., and Swain, M. H., Fatigue-life prediction methodology using small-crack theory, International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 21, pp.109-119, (1999).

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(98)00058-9

Google Scholar

[5] Shyam, A., Allison, J. E., Szczepanski, C. J., Pollock, T. M., and Jones, J. W., Small fatigue crack growth in metallic materials: A model and it's application to engineering alloys, Acta Materialia, vol. 55, pp.6606-6616, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.022

Google Scholar

[6] Walker, K. F., Barter, S. A., The Critical Importance of Correctly Characterising Fatigue Crack Growth Rates in the Threshold Regime, 26th ICAF Symposium, pp.249-263, 1-3 June (2011).

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1664-3_20

Google Scholar

[7] El Haddad, H., Topper, T. H., and Smith, K. N., Prediction of non propagating cracks, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 11, pp.573-584, (1979).

DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(79)90081-x

Google Scholar

[8] Jones, R., Molent, L., and Walker, K., Fatigue Crack Growth in a Diverse Range of Materials, Journal of Fatigue, vol. 40, pp.43-50, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.01.004

Google Scholar

[9] White, P., Barter, S., and Molent, L., Observations of crack path changes caused by periodic underlaods in AA7050-T7451, International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 30, pp.1267-1278, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.08.021

Google Scholar

[10] Barter, S. A., Wanhill, R.J.H., Marker Loads for Quantitative Fractography (QF) of Fatigue in Aerospace Alloys, National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, the Netherlands. NLR-TR-2008-644, (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2746-7_2

Google Scholar

[11] Burchill, M., Barter, S., and Amsterdam, E., Improved Fatigue Life Predictions for Combat Aircraft Fatigue Life from a Novel Testing Program, AIAC 25-27 February, Melbourne, Australia, (2013).

Google Scholar

[12] White, P., Barter, S. A., and Wright, C., Small crack growth rates from simple sequences containing underloads in AA7050-T7451, International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 31, pp.1865-1874, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.014

Google Scholar

[13] Harter, J. A., AFGROW Users Guide and Technical Manual, Air Vehicles Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, WPAFB OH USA AFRL-VA-WP-TR-206, (2006).

Google Scholar

[14] NASA-JSC and SwRI, NASGRO® Fracture Mechanics and Fatigue Crack Growth Analysis Software, Version 4. 02, ed, (2002).

Google Scholar

[15] Barter, S., Burchill, M., and Jones, M., An investigation of the extent of closure in short crack growth in an aluminium alloy, to be presented at ICF, Melbourne, Australia, (2014).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.891-892.93

Google Scholar