Assessment of Daylighting Design Tools Against Test Cases Included in CIE's 171:2006 Report

Article Preview

Abstract:

Daylighting design of buildings is a neglected discipline of building physics, although it is an important element of a healthy indoor environment, since daylight influences the well being of every living being inhabiting a space inside and outside of buildings. It influences the biological rhythms of humans and also enables a visual feedback from the surroundings. To evaluate daylighting inside of buildings one may use any of the available numero-graphical or numerical approaches as much as computer tools. Nevertheless one does not know how precise these methodologies really are. The values of sky, externally and internally reflected components of the obtained daylight factor may vary depending on the given tool, used. To prevent such errors CIE did publish a technical report for the validation of computer design tools, howbeit it can be used to verify the quality of older methods too. The aim of the paper is to point out, that numero-graphical approaches can sometimes determine the daylight factor levels with a smaller errata in contrast to newly developed software, particularly if it handles about the sky and externally reflected components of daylight factor.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

352-355

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P. Rybár, F. Šesták, M. Juklová, J. Hraška, J. Vaverka, Denní osvětlení a oslunění budov, ERA group spol. s. r. o., Brno, (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] R. Kittler, L. Kittlerová, Návrh a hodnotenie denného osvetlenia, Alfa, Bratislava, (1975).

Google Scholar

[3] G. W. Larson, R. Shakespeare, Rendering with RADIANCE-The Art of Science of Lighting Visualization, Booksurge Llc., South Carolina USA, (2004).

Google Scholar

[4] Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage, CIE 171: 2006 Technical report - Test cases to assess the accuracy of lighting computer programs, CIE, Vienna, (2006).

DOI: 10.25039/tr.171.2006

Google Scholar

[5] Dau Design and Consulting Inc., Validation of AGi32 against CIE 171: 2006, Dau Design and Consulting Inc., Calgary, (2007).

Google Scholar

[6] ENTPE - DGCB / CRNS Laboratory, Assessment of Velux Daylight Visualizer 2 against CIE 171: 2006 test cases, ENTPE - DGCB / CRNS Laboratory, Vaulx-en-Velin Cedex, (2009).

DOI: 10.18552/2019/idscmt5159

Google Scholar

[7] F. Maamari, Simulation numérique de l'éclairage, limites et potentialités, INSA de Lyon, Lyon, (2004).

Google Scholar

[8] S. Darula and R. Kittler, CIE General sky standard defining luminance distributions, Moon, (2002).

Google Scholar

[9] Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage, CIE DS 011. 2/E: 2002 Spatial distribution of daylight - CIE standard general sky, Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage, Vienna, (2002).

DOI: 10.25039/ds011.2003

Google Scholar

[10] J. Kaňka, Inovovaný způsob použití Daniljukovy metody, Světlo 4/2011, 2011, pp.44-46.

Google Scholar