The Development of Green Innovation Measurement Based on Inter Rater Agreement Approach: A Preliminary Study

Article Preview

Abstract:

The rising of environmental concerns from customers, buyers, communities, and government regulations have forced company to implement innovative and proactive corporate environmental management such as green supply chain management (GSCM) and green innovation. The aim of the paper is to discuss on the development of green innovation measurement. The data were collected through a questionnaire-based survey from two experts. The data are analyzed using Inter Rater Agreement. The findings show the kappa value is above 80 percent which indicates the perfect agreement between both of the raters on the proposed measurements for green marketing innovation and reverse logistics innovation. By including these two constructs into existing green innovation activity, it is possible to show the complete picture of green innovation to increase the performance of GSCM.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. -Y. Chiou, H.K. Chan, F. Lettice and S. H. Chung, The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan, Transportation Research Part E. 47 (2011) 822-836.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.016

Google Scholar

[2] Y. -S. Chen, S. -B. Lai and C. -T. Wen, The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan, Journal of Business Ethics. 67 (4) (2006) 331-339.

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5

Google Scholar

[3] Q. Zhu, J. Sarkis and K. -h. Lai, Green supply chain management implications for closing the loop, Transportation Research Part E. 44 (2008) 1-18.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2006.06.003

Google Scholar

[4] Y. -S. Chen, The driver of green innovation and green image - green core competence, Journal Business Ethics 81(3) (2008) 551-543.

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9522-1

Google Scholar

[5] M. E. Porter and C. Linde, Green and competitive, Harvard Business Review. 73(5) (1995) 120-134.

Google Scholar

[6] OECD, Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, Paris: OECD/European Communities, (2005).

DOI: 10.1787/9785760201737-ru

Google Scholar

[7] A. Reid and M. Miedzinski, Eco-innovation: Final report for sectoral watch, Europe: Technopolis Group, (2008).

Google Scholar

[8] B. M. Beamon, Designing the green supply chain, Logistic Information Management. 12(4) (1999) 332-342.

DOI: 10.1108/09576059910284159

Google Scholar

[9] Q. Zhu and J. Sarkis, Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises, Journal of Operations Management. 22(3) (2004) 265-89.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2004.01.005

Google Scholar

[10] E.E. Smith and S. Perks, A perceptual study of the impact of green practice implementation on the business functions, Southern African Business Review. 14(3) (2010) 1-29.

Google Scholar

[11] R. Richey, S. Genchev and P. Daugherty, The role of resource commitment and innovation in reverse logistics performance, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 35(4) (2005) 233-257.

DOI: 10.1108/09600030510599913

Google Scholar

[12] R.G. Richey, H. Chen, S.E. Genchev and P.J. Daugherty, Developing effective reverse logistics programs, Industrial Marketing Management. 34(8) (2005) 830-840.

DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.01.003

Google Scholar

[13] J. Uebersax, Statistical Methods for Diagnostic Agreement, John Uebersax Enterprises LLC, Retrieved November 2, 2012, from http: /www. john-uebersax. com/stat/agree. htm.

Google Scholar

[14] J.R. Landis and G.G. Koch, The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data, International Biometric Society. 33(1) (1977) 159-174.

Google Scholar