Comparative Study of TQM Practices between Japanese and Non-Japanese Companies: Proposed Conceptual Framework

Article Preview

Abstract:

In todays highly competitive market, the demand for quality is a critical factor for organization to survive in the ever-expanding global marketplace. The concept of total quality management (TQM) has been developed as a result of intense global competition. Japanese companies have had superior achievement, and left their counterparts, non-Japanese far behind. One of the TQM strength practices in Japanese companies is technical aspects; tools and techniques namely statistical process control (SPC), total productive maintenance (TPM) and lean production. The purpose of this paper is to compare TQM practices between Japanese and non-Japanese companies, and develop the conceptual framework based on extensive review of the literature. Three theories; institutional theory, system theory and contingency theory have been identified and applied in this study for developing conceptual framework. Based on literature review, Japanese companies have higher TQM practices compared to non-Japanese companies. Furthermore, this study proposes that SPC, TPM and lean production are mediators for TQM in Japanese companies. This proposed research will help the academicians and industry players to have better understanding of TQM implementation in order to improve business performance effectively in the future.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

371-377

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. Laosirihongthong, A Comparative Study of Implementation of Manufacturing Strategies in Thai and Indian Automotive Manufacturing Companies, Industrial Engineering, vol. 24, no. 2, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/s0278-6125(05)80013-5

Google Scholar

[2] A. G. Garvin, Managing Quality. New York: The Free Press, (1988).

Google Scholar

[3] V. Arumugam, K. -B. Ooi, and T. -C. Fong, TQM practices and quality management performance: An investigation of their relationship using data from ISO 9001: 2000 firms in Malaysia, The TQM Journal, vol. 20, no. 6, pp.636-650, (2008).

DOI: 10.1108/17542730810909383

Google Scholar

[4] A. Chi, A. Bahjat, and Y. Matsui, Quality management practices and competitive performance : Empirical evidence from Japanese manufacturing companies, Intern. Journal of Production Economics, vol. 133, no. 2, pp.518-529, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.01.024

Google Scholar

[5] M. Miyagawa and K. Yoshida, TQM practices of Japanese-owned manufacturers in the USA and China, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 27, no. 7, pp.736-755, (2010).

DOI: 10.1108/02656711011062363

Google Scholar

[6] I. Sila, Examining the effects of contextual factors on TQM and performance through the lens of organizational theories: An empirical study, Journal of Operations Management, vol. 25, no. 1, pp.83-109, Jan. (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2006.02.003

Google Scholar

[7] W. B. Rouse, A theory of enterprise transformation, Systems Engineering, vol. 8, no. 4, pp.279-295, (2005).

Google Scholar

[8] S. Ellis, T. Almor, and O. Shenkar, Structural contingency revisited: toward a dynamic system model, Emergence, vol. 4, no. 4, pp.51-85, (2002).

DOI: 10.1207/s15327000em0404_6

Google Scholar

[9] J. C. Miller, A. D. Meyer, and J. Nakane, Benchmarking Global Manufacturing. Irwin, Homewood, IL: Business One, (1992).

Google Scholar

[10] N. M. Zakuan, S. M. Yusof, and T. Laosirihongthong, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence Proposed relationship of TQM and organisational performance using structured equation modelling, Total Quality Management, vol. 21, no. 2, pp.185-203, (2010).

DOI: 10.1080/14783360903550020

Google Scholar

[11] V. K. S. Brki, M. M. Klarin, A. D. Brki, V. J. Lu, and D. D. Milanovi, Simultaneous consideration of contingency factors and quality management : An empirical study of Serbian companies, Journal of Business, vol. 5, no. 3, pp.866-883, (2011).

Google Scholar

[12] I. A. Holjevac, Business ethics in tourism – As a dimension of TQM, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, vol. 19, no. 10, pp.1029-1041, Oct. (2008).

DOI: 10.1080/14783360802264103

Google Scholar

[13] M. Jun, S. Cai, and H. Shin, TQM practice in maquiladora: Antecedents of employee satisfaction and loyalty, Journal of Operations Management, vol. 24, no. 6, pp.791-812, Dec. (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2005.09.006

Google Scholar

[14] J. C. Bou and I. Beltrán, Total Quality Management & Business commitment human resource strategy and firm performance : an empirical study Total Quality Management , High-commitment Human Resource Strategy and Firm Performance : An Empirical Study, Total Quality Management, vol. 16, no. 1, pp.37-41, (2005).

DOI: 10.1080/1478336042000309875

Google Scholar

[15] P. Corredor and S. Goñi, TQM and performance: Is the relationship so obvious?, Journal of Business Research, vol. 64, no. 8, pp.830-838, Aug. (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.10.002

Google Scholar

[16] M. Demirbag, E. Tatoglu, M. Tekinkus, and S. Zaim, An analysis of the relationship between TQM implementation and organizational performance: Evidence from Turkish SMEs, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, vol. 17, no. 6, pp.829-847, (2006).

DOI: 10.1108/17410380610678828

Google Scholar

[17] J. M. Juran, Juran's Quality Handbook. Singapore: McGRAW-HILL, (1998).

Google Scholar

[18] J. M. Juran and F. M. Gryna, Quality Planning and Analysis, 3rd ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book, (1993).

Google Scholar

[19] J. J. Dahlgaard, K. Kristensen, G. K. Kanji, H. J. Juhl, and A. S. Sohal, Quality Management Practices: a comparative study between East and West, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 15, no. 8/9, pp.812-826, (1998).

DOI: 10.1108/02656719810791675

Google Scholar

[20] M. F. Ahmad and S. M. Yusof, Comparative study of TQM practices between Japanese and non-Japanese electrical and electronics companies in Malaysia: Survey results, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, vol. 21, no. 1, pp.11-20, Jan. (2010).

DOI: 10.1080/14783360903492520

Google Scholar

[21] K. Ishikawa, What is Total Quality Management. USA: Prentice-Hall, (1995).

Google Scholar

[22] J. J. Dahlgaard, K. Kristensen, G. K. Kanji, H. J. Juhl, and A. S. Sohal, Quality Management Practices: a comparative study between East and West, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 15, no. 8/9, pp.812-826, (1998).

DOI: 10.1108/02656719810791675

Google Scholar

[23] E. Deming, Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT, (1986).

Google Scholar

[24] N. Takeuchi, M. Wakabayashi, and Z. Chen, The Strategic HRM Configuration for Competitive Advantage : Evidence from Japanese Firms in China and Taiwan, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, vol. 20, no. 1, pp.447-480, (2003).

Google Scholar

[25] R. E. Cole, Introduction: special issue on Total Quality Management. Spring: California Management Review, 1993, p.7–11.

Google Scholar

[26] K. Nakamura, Z. A. Husudo, and H. U.M., Management Comparison and Localization. 2001, pp.100-115.

Google Scholar

[27] J. K. Liker, The Toyota way, 14 Management Principles From the World's Greatest Manufacturer. USA: McGraw-Hill Book, (2005).

Google Scholar

[28] Y. Monden, Toyota Production System: An Integrated Approach to Just-in-Time. Norcross, GA: Industrial Engineering and Management Press, (1993).

Google Scholar

[29] M. Imai, Gemba Kaizen: a common sense; low-cost approach to management. Singapore: McGraw-Hill, (1997).

Google Scholar

[30] Samuel K.M. Ho., Japanese 5-S-Where TQM begins, TQM magazine, vol. 11, no. 5, pp.311-320, (1999).

DOI: 10.1108/09544789910282345

Google Scholar

[31] J. K. Liker, The Toyota Way — 14 Management Principles from the World ' s Greatest Manufacturer. (2004).

Google Scholar

[32] G. T. Lumpkin and G. G. Dess, Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance, Academy of Management Review, vol. 21, no. 1, p.135–172., (1996).

DOI: 10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568

Google Scholar

[33] J. M. Rohani, S. M. Yusof, and I. Mohamad, The relationship between statistical process control critical success factors and performance: A structural equation modeling approach, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp.1352-1356, Dec. (2009).

DOI: 10.1109/ieem.2009.5373033

Google Scholar

[34] M. E. Hacker, A Review of Lean Assessment in Organizations : An Exploratory Study of Lean Practices by Electronics Manufacturers, Strategies, vol. 24, no. 2003, pp.55-67, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/s0278-6125(05)80007-x

Google Scholar

[35] M. Imai, Kaizen: The Key to Japan"s Competitive Success. New York: Random House Business Division, (1986).

Google Scholar