Statistical Analysis of Pit Dimensions for Pre-Corroded AA 7075-T6

Yong Fang Huang; Li Jie Chen; Xu Bin Ye

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.906.259

Paper Titles

Rheological Behaviors of Carbonaceous Materials Suspended in Sodium Alginate Solutions
p.232

Preparation and In Vitro Degradation of PDO Intravascular Stents with Braided Structure
p.238

Strain Hardening Behaviour of Hipped and Non-Hipped Castings of Aluminium Alloy 354 Subjected to Two-Step Ageing Treatments
p.249

The Change of Processing Maps in Hot Compression Procession for Ti-6.0Al-7.0Nb Biomedical Titanium Alloy
p.254

Statistical Analysis of Pit Dimensions for Pre-Corroded AA 7075-T6
p.259

Feature Recognition of Corrosion Pit for Pre-Corroded AA 2524 and Statistical Analysis
p.263

Precipitation Behavior of the Second Phase Particles in Grain Oriented Silicon Steel Slabs under Different Reheating Conditions
p.268

Electrochemical Corrosion Behavior of Different Graphite Shapes Cast Irons in Acidic Solution
p.275

The Extrusion Behavior of AZ31 Mg Alloys by Finite Element Simulation
p.285

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 906Statistical Analysis of Pit Dimensions for...

Statistical Analysis of Pit Dimensions for Pre-Corroded AA 7075-T6

Abstract:

Aluminum alloy 7075-T6 specimens were corroded in 3.5% NaCl solution for 120 hours and 240 hours, respectively. Morphology and dimensions of corrosion pits on specimen surface were inspected with white light confocal profiler. Statistical analysis shows that pit dimensions can be fitted well with log-normal and Gumbel distribution. After surface inspections, we performed high-cycle fatigue tests for the specimens. Fracture analysis shows that fatigue cracks initiate from single pit or two adjacent pits, and the crack-initiation pit shape and dimensions were examined with SEM. It is found that initiation pit dimensions can be well described with the log-normal distribution. Additionally, initiation pit dimensions are significantly larger than those measured on specimen surface before fatigue tests.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 906)

Pages:

259-262

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.906.259

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

April 2014

Authors:

Yong Fang Huang, Li Jie Chen*, Xu Bin Ye

Keywords:

Aluminium Alloy, Pits Distribution, Pitting Corrosion, Statistical Analysis

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Z. Szklarska-Smmialowska, Pitting corrosion of aluminum, Corros. Sci. 41 (1999) 1743-1767.

Google Scholar

[2] G. T. Burstein, C. Liu, R. M. Souto, S. P. Vines, Origins of pitting corrosion, Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 39 (2004) 25-30.

Google Scholar

[3] Danfeng Zhang, Xiaoming Tan, Yueliang Chen, Distribution rule of corrosion damage morphology parameters for aluminum alloy, Proceedings of 2011 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, 358-361.

DOI: 10.1109/isi.2011.5984114

Google Scholar

[4] J.J. Medved, M. Breton, P.E. Irving, Corrosion pit size distributions and fatigue lives—a study of the EIFS technique for fatigue design in the presence of corrosion, Int. J. Fatigue 26 (2004) 71-80.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(03)00069-0

Google Scholar

[5] D. L. DuQuesnay, P. R. Underhill, H. J. Britt, Fatigue crack growth from corrosion damage in 7075-T6511 aluminium alloy under aircraft loading, Int. J. Fatigue 25 (2003) 371-377.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(02)00168-8

Google Scholar

[6] K. Jones, D. W. Hoeppner, Pit-to-crack transition in pre-corroded 7075-T6 aluminum alloy under cyclic loading, Corro. Sci. 47 (2005) 2185-2198.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2004.10.004

Google Scholar