An Experimental Study on the Rainfall-Runoff Progress of Wheat under Different Slope Angle

Article Preview

Abstract:

Rainfall-runoff process plays an important role in hydrological cycle, and the study on the rainfall-runoff will provide foundation and basis for research on basin hydrology and flood forecasting. In this paper, the surface runoff and subsurface flow of wheat were observed in the laboratory by artificial rainfall, and analyzed the cumulated surface runoff and recession process of subsurface flow by regression analysis. In addition, the factors affected the runoff and response of soil moisture on the runoff coefficients was also discussed. Results showed that the rainfall intensity, soil coverage and slope had important influence on the surface runoff generation, and the surface runoff was observed when the total rainfall amount exceeded 32mm and 13mm for 5°and 15° slope respectively. The cumulative surface runoff could be expressed as a power function, which had higher determination coefficient R2 (0.92~0.999). The subsurface flow was only observed at the ripening period and wheat stubble treatment, and mainly affected by slope angle and initial soil moisture, whereas rainfall intensity showed little impact. The recession curve of subsurface flow can be described as a simple exponential expression or power function, which the determination coefficient was 0.88 and 0.94 by regression analysis, respectively. Moreover, there was an obvious threshold (approximately 30%) between the average initial soil moisture and runoff coefficients, which the runoff increased significantly as above the threshold.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 912-914)

Pages:

1986-1994

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Xiaofang Rui, Xinglong Gong, Chao Zhang et al. Formation and calculation of watershed runoff yield. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering. 2009, 28(6): 146-150.

Google Scholar

[2] Xiaofang Rui. Theory of Hydrology. Beijing: China Water Power Press, (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] Tarboton D G. Rainfall-runoff processes. Utah State University, (2003).

Google Scholar

[4] Xiaofang Rui. Theory of runoff generation. Beijing: Water Resources and Electric Power Publishing Hous, (1995).

Google Scholar

[5] Renjun Zhao. Basin hydrological modeling. Beijing: Water Resources and Electric Power Publishing Hous, (1984).

Google Scholar

[6] Kirchner J W. A double paradox in catchment hydrology and geochemistry. Hydrological Processes. 2003, 17(4): 871-874.

DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5108

Google Scholar

[7] Mcdonnell J J. Where does water go when it rains? Moving beyond the variable source area concept of rainfall‐runoff response. Hydrological processes. 2003, 17(9): 1869-1875.

DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5132

Google Scholar

[8] Calvo A, Pini R, Barbero J. Influences of micro-relief patterns and plant cover on runoff related processes in badlands from Tabernas (SE Spain). Catena. 1997, 31(1): 23-38.

DOI: 10.1016/s0341-8162(97)00032-5

Google Scholar

[9] Castillo V M, Gomez-Plaza A, Martınez-Mena M. The role of antecedent soil water content in the runoff response of semiarid catchments: a simulation approach. Journal of Hydrology. 2003, 284(1): 114-130.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(03)00264-6

Google Scholar

[10] Yu J, Yang C, Liu C, et al. Slope runoff study in situ using rainfall simulator in mountainous area of North China. Journal of Geographical Sciences. 2009, 19(4): 461-470.

DOI: 10.1007/s11442-009-0461-x

Google Scholar

[11] Han S, Yang Y, Fan T, et al. Rainfall‐runoff processes in Shimen hillslope micro-atchment of Taihang Mountain, north China. Hydrological Processes. 2012, 26(9): 1332-1341.

DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8233

Google Scholar

[12] Kun Hu, Jingjie Yu, Jun Xia, et al. Plot scale runoff generation modelof lithoid mountainous areas in North China. Geographical Research. 2006, 25(4): 673-680.

Google Scholar

[13] Tallaksen L M. A review of baseflow recession analysis. Journal of hydrology. 1995, 165(1): 349-370.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(94)02540-r

Google Scholar

[14] Barnes B S. The structure of discharge-recession curves. Transactions, American Geophysical Union. 1939, 20: 721-725.

DOI: 10.1029/tr020i004p00721

Google Scholar

[15] Otnes J, Ræstad E. Hydrologi i praksis. Ingeniørforlaget, Oslo, 1978: 227-233.

Google Scholar

[16] Vogel R M, Kroll C N. Estimation of baseflow recession constants. Water Resources Management. 1996, 10(4): 303-320.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00508898

Google Scholar

[17] Cong Yang, Jingjie Yu, Changming Liu, et al. Experimental Study on Slope Runoff Generation Process in North China Mountainous Area. ACTA Geographical Sinica. 2005, 60(6): 1021-1028.

Google Scholar

[18] Brocca L, Melone F, Moramarco T, et al. Soil moisture temporal stability over experimental areas in Central Italy. Geoderma. 2009, 148(3): 364-374.

DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.11.004

Google Scholar

[19] Penna D, Tromp-Van Meerveld H J, Gobbi A, et al. The influence of soil moisture on threshold runoff generation processes in an alpine headwater catchment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2011, 15(3): 689-702.

DOI: 10.5194/hess-15-689-2011

Google Scholar