Adsorption Characteristics of Different Stratification in the Coal Reservoirs of Southern Qinshui Basin and its Main Controlling Factors

Abstract:

Based on previous measured data and adsorption isotherms experiment of six coal samples from different stratification of the southern Qinshui basin, discussed the diversity between different stratification on adsorption characteristics and its main controlling factors. The results show that: In the macro level, bright coal layer has the highest adsorption capacity, Langmuir volume (VL) is up to 40m³/t ; the adsorption capacity of dull coal and semi-dull coal is relatively low. By analyzing the relationship between the Langmuir volume of coal petrography and various factors, discovering the Langmuir volume has a positive correlation with vitrinite content, vitrinite reflectance, fixed carbon content, and micro-pores content, but negative correlation with ash, while it has no significant linear relationship between moisture, porosity, permeability. By grey relational analysis, it shows that the impact is in descending order from vitrinite content to fixed carbon content, vitrinite reflectance, micro-pores content, ash content.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 915-916)
• Pages: 1103-1107
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.915-916.1103
• Online since: April 2014
• Authors: Shu Ling Tang*, Da Zhen Tang, Hao Xu, Shu Tao, Yuan Fang, Li Jun Gao
• Keywords: Adsorption Characteristics, Different Stratification, Grey Relational Analysis, Main Controlling Factors

References

[1] Laxminarayana C, Crosdale P J. Role of coal type and rank on methane sorption characteristics of Bowen Basin, Australia coals [J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 1999, 40(4): 309-325.

DOI: 10.1016/s0166-5162(99)00005-1

[2] Crosdale P J, Beamish B, Valix M. Coalbed methane sorption related to coal composition [J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 1998, 35(1): 147-158.

DOI: 10.1016/s0166-5162(97)00015-3

[3] Gamson P, Beamish B, Johnson D. Coal microstructure and secondary mineralization: their effect on methane recovery [J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1996, 109(1): 165-179.

DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.1996.109.01.12

[4] Joubert J I, Grein C T, Bienstock D. Effect of moisture on the methane capacity of American coals [J]. Fuel, 1974, 53(3): 186-191.

DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(74)90009-x

[5] Levy J H, Day S J, Killingley J S. Methane capacities of Bowen Basin coals related to coal properties [J]. Fuel, 1997, 76(9): 813-819.

DOI: 10.1016/s0016-2361(97)00078-1

[6] YAO Yan-bin, LIU Da-meng . Adsorption Characteristics of Coal Reservoirs in North China and Its Influencing Factors [J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2007, 36(3): 308-314 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[7] CHEN Chun- lin, LIN Da- yang. Application of isothermal curves in estimating minable resour ce of coalbed methane [J]. Journal of China University of Mining& Technology, 2005, 34(5): 679- 682 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[8] ZHANG Qun, YANG Xi-lu. Adsorption isotherms characteristics of coal under conditions of equilibrium moisture [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 1999, 24(6): 566-570 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[9] Aslan N. Use of the grey analysis to determine optimal oil agglomeration with multiple performance characteristics. Fuel 2013; 109: 373–8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.069

[10] Liu JX, Jiang XM, Huang XY, Wu SH. Morphological characterization of super fine pulverized coal particle. Part 2. AFM investigation of single coal particle. Fuel 2010; 89: 3884-3891.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.07.001