Operational Training Management System (OPTRAMS) for Safe Operation in Process Plant

Article Preview

Abstract:

Many publications have reported about 37% of major accidents in petroleum, chemical, nuclear, aviation, and in the other process industries that occurred worldwide were due to human error. One of the keys contributing factors that could prevent these accidents is to provide appropriate training to the plant personnel. However, accidents still can happen if training is poorly managed and improperly trained personnel handling the operation of the plant. One of the established industrial standards to manage the training is Training element of Process Safety Management (PSM) 29 CFR 1910.119(g). This paper presents a system to manage training for safe operation following 29 CFR 1910.119(g) namely Operational Training Management System (OPTRAMS). It provides strategies to manage information and documentation related to training. OPTRAMS was implemented at the CO2-Hydrocarbon Absorption System (CHAS) pilot plant at Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS as a case study. The study showed that all operational training can be managed efficiently with OPTRAMS and also assists end users to identify the gaps that hinder training of PSM compliance. The implementation of this technique could help end users to prevent and minimize catastrophic accidents and comply with training of PSM standard.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

325-331

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. Burkolter, A. Kluge, J. Sauer, and S. Ritzmann, Comparative Study of Three Training Methods for Enhancing Process Control Performance: Emphasis Shift Training, Situation Awareness Training, and Drill and Practice, Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(5) (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.011

Google Scholar

[2] K.P. Prem, D. Ng, and M.S. Mannan, Harnessing Database Resources for Understanding the Profile of Chemical Process Industry Incidents, J. Loss Prev. Proc. Ind. 23(4) (2010), 549-560.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2010.05.003

Google Scholar

[3] W. Duan, G. Chen, Q. Ye, and Q. Chen, The Situation of Hazardous Chemical Accidents in China between 2000 and 2006, J. Hazard. Mate. 186(2-3) (2011), 1489-1494.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.029

Google Scholar

[4] J. Park, W. Jung, J. Ha, and Y. Shin, Analysis of Operators' Performance under Emergencies Using a Training Simulator of the Nuclear Power Plant, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 83(2) (2004), 179-186.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2003.09.009

Google Scholar

[5] J.K. Vaurio, Human Factors, Human Reliability and Risk Assessment in License Renewal of a Nuclear Power Plant, in Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. (2009), 1818-1826.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2009.05.014

Google Scholar

[6] S.H. Yang, L. Yang, and C.H. He, Improve Safety of Industrial Processes Using Dynamic Operator Training Simulators, Process Saf. Env. 79(6) (2001), 329-338.

DOI: 10.1205/095758201753373096

Google Scholar

[7] E. Mason, Elements of Process Safety Management: Part 2, J. Chem. Health Saf. 8(5) (2001), 23-26.

Google Scholar

[8] H.A. Aziz, A.M. Shariff, and R. Rusli, Managing Process Safety Information Based on Process Safety Management Requirements, Process Saf. Prog. 00(00) (2013), 1-8.

DOI: 10.1002/prs.11610

Google Scholar

[9] R. Pitblado, Global Process Industry Initiatives to Reduce Major Accident Hazards, J. Loss Prev. Proc. Ind. 24(1) (2011), 57-62.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2010.08.006

Google Scholar

[10] G.B. DeWolf, Process Safety Management in the Pipeline Industry: Parallels and Differences between the Pipeline Integrity Management (Imp) Rule of the Office of Pipeline Safety and the Psm/Rmp Approach for Process Facilities, J. Hazard. Mate. 104(1-3) (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2003.08.008

Google Scholar

[11] W.F. Early, Database Management Systems for Process Safety, J. Hazard. Mate. 130(1-2) (2006), 53-57.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Kho. Strengthening Process Safety Requirements in Hse Management System an Noc's Experience. AIChE PPSS conference. (2008).

Google Scholar

[13] V. Zaloom and P. Ramachandran, A Computer Based Training System for Process Safety Management, Comput. Hum. Behav. 31(1-2) (1996), 511-514.

DOI: 10.1016/0360-8352(96)00187-8

Google Scholar

[14] P.M. Myers, B. Watson, and M. Watson, Effective Training Programs Using Instructional Systems Design and E-Learning, Process Saf. Prog. 27(2) (2008), 131-138.

DOI: 10.1002/prs.10245

Google Scholar

[15] J.A. Klein, Operational Discipline in the Workplace, Process Saf. Prog. 24(4) (2005), 228-235.

Google Scholar

[16] J. Louvar, Guidance for Safety Performance Indicators, Process Saf. Prog. 29(4) (2010), 387-388.

DOI: 10.1002/prs.10418

Google Scholar

[17] A.S. West, Plant Process Safety Starts in the Laboratory, J. Chem. Health Saf. 15 March/Apr (1999), 15-17.

DOI: 10.1016/s1074-9098(00)80010-6

Google Scholar

[18] N. Langerman, Management of Change for Laboratories and Pilot Plants, Org. Process Res. Dev. 12(6) (2008), 1305–1306.

DOI: 10.1021/op8001855

Google Scholar

[19] N. Langerman, Lab-Scale Process Safety Management, J. Chem. Health Saf. (July/August) (2009), 22-28.

Google Scholar