Three Vertical Flow Constructed Wetlands Filled with Different Packing Materials for Piggery Wastewater Treatment

Article Preview

Abstract:

Seasonal performances of three vertical2flowconstructedwetlands (VFCWs) filled with different packing materials for piggery wastewater treatment was investigated. Results showed that there were no some significant seasonal differences in the COD removal efficiency among three types of VFCWs. Biodegradation of organic matter in all three VFCWs were found following the first order rate model. The N removal efficiencies in conventional VFCWs indifferent seasons constantly maintained at 52%. However, N removal efficiencies were found fluctuating over seasons in VFCWs filled with zeolite or zeolite cinder, 89.8% and 93.4% in autumn, 64.2% and 73.5% in winter, and around 80% in spring and summer, respectively. Total nitrogen (TN) removal efficiencies of all VFCWs in winter were considerably lower than those in the other seasons due to relatively weaker processes of nitrification-denitrification. The nitrification activity in VFCWs filled with zeolite2cinder was the highest among all of VFCWs, while the denitrification activity in VFCWs filled with zeolite or zeolite-cinder was more in tensive than that in the conventional VFCWs, agreeing with the TN removal efficiencies in three VFCWs. As packing material, zeolite is able to accelerate the process of denitrification as well as TN removal efficiencies of VFCWs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 919-921)

Pages:

2178-2181

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] E.I. Torsten, B.T. Wik and P. Lindén: Aquaculture Vol. 287 (2009), p.361.

Google Scholar

[2] W.T. Mook, M.K. Chakrabari, G.M.A. Aroua and et al.: Desalination Vol. 285 (2012), p.1.

Google Scholar

[3] G.M. Zhao, S.K. Mehta and Z.P. Liu: Agricultural Water Management Vol. 97 (2012), p. (1987).

Google Scholar

[4] S. Simonel, B. Brian and H. Eric: Aquacultural Engineering Vol. 39 (2010), p.78.

Google Scholar

[5] J.M. Webb, R. Quintã, S. Papadimitriou and et al.: Water Research Vol. 46 (2012), p.5102.

Google Scholar

[6] Q. Fontenot, C. Bonvillain, M. Kilgen and et al.: Bioresource Technology Vol. 98 (2007), p.1700.

Google Scholar

[7] E.I.W. Torsten, T.L. BjÖrn and I.W. Per: Aquaculture Vol. 287 (2009), p.361.

Google Scholar

[8] N. Dean: Environment Problem Vol. 3 (2012), p.19.

Google Scholar

[9] G.M. Zhao, S.K. Mehta and Z.P. Liu: Agricultural Water Management Vol. 97 (2010), p. (1987).

Google Scholar

[10] Y.H. Shi, G.Y. Zhang, J.Z. Liu and et al.: Bioresource Technology Vol. 102(2011), p.9416.

Google Scholar