Financial Analysis Methodology of the Benefit of Safety Investment

Article Preview

Abstract:

People are usually skeptical about the financial merit of safety investment due to inadequate demonstration of safety benefit. Many recent studies on safety economy fail to correlate safety outcome with specific safety investment and to consider its long-term effect. Also loss cost uncertainty is not properly addressed in current researches. In this report, we propose a methodology with the use of long-term financial analysis models. Loss cost is well presented through an innovative use of Poisson Distribution model. Financial indicators including NPV, IRR, Tpp, Tdppare used to figure out benefit of safety investment.A case study is introduced hereby to explore the availability of the methodology. Result shows that the proposed methodology is feasible. Financial analysis of safety benefit constitutes part of a full appreciation of safety investment outcome and could serve as indispensable information for decision-making.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 926-930)

Pages:

3818-3821

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Melvin L. Myers, Henry P. Cole, Joan Mazur, Steve Isaacs, Economics& Safety: Understanding the Cost of Injuries and Their Prevention, Professional Safety, Apr. 2008, 37-45.

DOI: 10.13031/2013.21192

Google Scholar

[2] Goetzel, R. Examining the value of integrating occupational health and safety and health promotion programs in the workplace, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, NIOSH.

DOI: 10.1037/e585772012-003

Google Scholar

[3] European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, Quality of the working environment and productivity: Research findings and case studies, Brussels, Belgium, (2004).

Google Scholar

[4] ASSE, White paper addressing the Return on Investment for Safety, Health and Environmental Management Programs.

Google Scholar

[5] Anthony Veltri, Jim Ramsay, Economic Analysis-Make the Business Case for SH&E, Professional Safety, Sep. 2009, 22-30.

Google Scholar

[6] Yun Luo, etc., Safety Economy, Chemical Industry Press, ISBN 7-5025-5345-2, (2004).

Google Scholar

[7] Michael Behm, Anthony Veltri, Ilene K. Kleinsorge, The Cost of Safety: Cost Analysis Model Helps Build Business Case for Safety, Professional Safety, Apr. 2004, 49(4): 22-29.

Google Scholar

[8] Hong-wei Ma, Gang Lu, Safety Cost and the Determination of the Indexes in the Safety Analysis, Journal of Xuzhou Institute of Architectural Technology, Mar. 2004, 4(1): 39-42.

Google Scholar

[9] Zhen-Yi Liu, Chang-gen Feng, Ai-tianPeng, Yun-zhen Tan, Relation Between Safety Cost and Safety Conditions, Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, Jul. 2003, 32(4): 447-451.

Google Scholar

[10] Clark Kilgore, P. L. Clemens, Economy-Based Countermeasure Decisions: A Tutorial for SH&E Professionals, Professional Safety, Apr. 2008, www. asse. org.

Google Scholar

[11] Qingguo Yao, Safety cost and economic optimization of safety work in coal mining, J of China Coal Society, Jun. 2001, 26(3): 331-334.

Google Scholar