Forestry Investment and Output Value of Forestry in China

Article Preview

Abstract:

The relationship between output value of forestry and forestry investment is considered as an imperative issue in forestry economy. In this paper, Granger causality tests are applied to examine the causal relationship between the output value of forestry and the forestry investment for China during 1998 to 2012. Empirical evidence reveals forestry investment and output value of forestry are co-integrated and there is unidirectional causality running from forestry investment to the output value of forestry but not vice versa. With the purpose of conquering the lack of forestry investment, government need to speed up the finance expenditure on forestry, to expand sources of forestry investment and to improve efficiency of investment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 926-930)

Pages:

3826-3829

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Asafu-Adjaye J. The relationship between energy consumption, energy prices and economic growth: time series evidence from Asian developing countries[J]. Energy economics, 2000, 22(6): 615-625.

DOI: 10.1016/s0140-9883(00)00050-5

Google Scholar

[2] Li Ping, Zhang Junbiao. Empirical study on Interactive Relationship between Fiscal Expenditure on Forestry S&T and Forestry Economic Growth in China[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2011(9): 134-138. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Granger C W J, Newbold P. Spurious regressions in econometrics[J]. Journal of econometrics, 1974, 2(2): 111-120.

DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(74)90034-7

Google Scholar

[4] Engle R F, Granger C W J. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing[J]. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 1987: 251-276.

DOI: 10.2307/1913236

Google Scholar

[5] Shiu A, Lam P L. Electricity consumption and economic growth in China[J]. Energy policy, 2004, 32(1): 47-54.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4215(02)00250-1

Google Scholar

[6] Granger C W J. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1969: 424-438.

DOI: 10.2307/1912791

Google Scholar

[7] Chiou-Wei S Z, Chen C F, Zhu Z. Economic growth and energy consumption revisited—evidence from linear and nonlinear Granger causality[J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(6): 3063-3076.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.02.002

Google Scholar

[8] Johansen S. Statistical analysis of cointegrationvectors[J]. Journal of economic dynamics and control, 1988, 12(2): 231-254.

Google Scholar