Risk Assessment of Chemical Plants Based on the Vulnerability

Article Preview

Abstract:

. The vulnerability of chemical plants’ disaster bodies was put forward through analyzing the four aspects of disaster bodies’ vulnerability. The impacted factors were analyzed and people, facilities, materials, environment and other targets’ exposure, sensibility, coping ability, resilience were also analyzed, so as to present the index system of chemical plants’ disaster bodies. Therefore, it can give a good idea and method to establish the chemical plants’ overall vulnerability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 926-930)

Pages:

3946-3949

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Hessel V, Vural Gürsel I, Wang Q, et al. Potential Analysis of Smart Flow Processing and Micro Process Technology for Fastening Process Development: Use of Chemistry and Process Design as Intensification Fields[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2012, 35(7): 1184-1204.

DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201200038

Google Scholar

[2] Turner B L, Kasperson R E, Matson P A, et al. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2003, 100(14): 8074-8079.

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1231335100

Google Scholar

[3] Klein R J T, Smit M J, Goosen H, et al. Resilience and vulnerability: coastal dynamics or Dutch dikes[J]. Geographical Journal, 1998: 259-268.

DOI: 10.2307/3060615

Google Scholar

[4] Aven T. A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis covering both safety and security[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2007, 92(6): 745-754.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.03.008

Google Scholar

[5] Aven T. A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis covering both safety and security[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2007, 92(6): 745-754.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.03.008

Google Scholar