Gelatin/Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds: Studies on Adhesion, Growth and Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this work, we developed a 3-dimensional bone tissue engineering scaffold from type B gelatin and hydroxyapatite. Two types of scaffolds, pure gelatin (pI~5) (Gel) and gelatin/hydroxyapatite (30/70 wt./wt.) (Gel/HA), were prepared from concentrated solutions (5% wt./wt.) using foaming/freeze drying method. The results SEM revealed the interconnected-homogeneous pores of Gel and Gel/HA were 121  119 and 148  83m, respectively. Hydroxyapatite improved mechanical property of the gelatin scaffolds, especially at dry state. Compressive modulus of Gel and Gel/HA scaffolds were at 118±21.68 and 510±109.08 kPa, respectively. The results on in vitro cells culture showed that Gel/HA scaffolds promoted attachment of rat’s mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) to a 1.23 folds higher than the Gel scaffolds. Population doubling time (PDT) of MSC on Gel and Gel/HA scaffolds were 51.16 and 54.89 hours, respectively. In term of osteogenic differentiation, Gel/HA scaffolds tended to enhance ALP activity and calcium content of MSC better than those of the Gel scaffold. Therefore the Gel/HA scaffolds had a potential to be applied in bone tissue engineering.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 93-94)

Pages:

121-124

Citation:

Online since:

January 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Langer, R.S. and Vacantri, J.P. (1999). Sci. Am. 280: 86-89.

Google Scholar

[2] Langer R. and Vacanti J.P. (1993). Science 260: 920-6.

Google Scholar

[3] Petite H., Viateau V., Bensaid W. and Guillemin G. (2000). Nat Biotechnol 18: 959-63.

Google Scholar

[4] Cerroni, L., Filocamo, R., Fabbri, M. and Condo, S.G. (2002). Biomed. Eng. 19: 119-124.

Google Scholar

[5] Wozney, J.M. and Rosen, V. (1998). Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 346: 26-37.

Google Scholar

[6] Suchanek, W. and Yoshimura, M. (1998). J. Mater. Res. 13 (1): 94-117.

Google Scholar

[7] Asashina, I., Watanabe, M., Sakurai, N., Mori, M. and Enomoto, S. (1997). 44: 63-70.

Google Scholar

[8] Myung C.C., Ching-Chang, K. and William H.D. (2003). J. Biomaterials. 24: 2853-2862.

Google Scholar

[9] Reddi, A.H. (1998). Natl. Biotechnol. 16: 247-252.

Google Scholar

[10] Chevallay, B. and Herbage, D. (2000). Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 38: 211-218.

Google Scholar

[11] Cooper, C.W. and Falb, R.D. (1971). Sci. 146 (1): 218-224.

Google Scholar

[12] Bigi, A., Panzavolta, S. and Roveri, N. (1988). Biomaterials 19: 739-744.

Google Scholar

[13] Smith J.R., Pochampally R., Perry A., Hsu S. and Prockop D.J. (2004). Stem Cells 22: 823-31.

Google Scholar

[14] Takahashi Y., Yamamoto M. and Tabata Y. (2005). Biomaterials 26: 3587-3596.

Google Scholar

[15] Freshney, R. I. (1994) Culture of Animal Cells. Wiley Liss, New York, 267-289.

Google Scholar

[16] Vachiraroj N., Ratanavaraporn J., and others, IJBIOMAC, 2009 (in press).

Google Scholar