The Effect of Glass Fiber Aspect Ratio on Mechanical and Thermal Properties of PU/GF Foam Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study Polyurethane (PU)/glass fiber (GF) foam composites have been produced. The PU matrix consisted of Polyol and Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate (MDI). A long glass fiber (GF) at different aspect ratio (L/D ratio) was used to study the effect of reinforcement content on their properties such as; mechanical properties (flexural modulus, stress and strain at break, hardness, impact strength) and thermal properties (heat distortion temperature, HDT). It is found that the mechanical properties such as the flexural properties (strength, strain, and modulus) and impact strength increase as increasing GF aspect ratio and optimum at aspect ratio = 7.05. However, GF aspect ratio has a slight effect on the composites hardness due to GF contents and PU densities of PU/GF foam composites are not different, significantly. And the heat distortion temperature slightly increases as GF aspect ratio.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 93-94)

Pages:

210-213

Citation:

Online since:

January 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Christopher W. Macosko, Rim: Fundamentals of Reaction Injection Molding, Hanser, (1989).

Google Scholar

[2] A. Jacob, K. Simpson, G. March and R. Stewart, Driving forces, Reinforced plastics v. 47 no. 2, pp.23-25 (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] B.T. Astrom, Manufacturing of Polymer Composites, Chapman & Hall UK. (1997).

Google Scholar

[4] C.D. Snyder, Materials for Reaction Injection Molding (RIM) Processsing, Composites 2001 Convention and Trade Show, 3-6 October (2001).

Google Scholar

[5] H.D. Rozman , K.R. Ahmadhilmi, A. Abubakar, Polyurethane (PU)-oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB) composites: the effect of EFBG reinforcement in mat form and isocyanate treatment on the mechanical properties, Polymer Testing 23 (2004) 559-565.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2003.11.004

Google Scholar

[6] A. Jacob, K. Simpson, G. March and R. Stewart, Composites on the road to the big time, Reinforced plastics v. 47 no. 2, pp.33-47 (2003).

Google Scholar

[7] K. Bledzki, J. Gassan, Prog. Polym. Sci. 24 (1999).

Google Scholar

[6] H.D. Rozman, G.S. Tay, A. Abubakar, R.N. Kumar, Tensile properties of oil palm empty fruit bunch-polyurethane composites, Eur. Polym. J. 37 (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0014-3057(01)00063-5

Google Scholar