Classifiers for Ground-Based Cloud Images Using Texture Features

Article Preview

Abstract:

The classification of ground-based cloud images has received more attention recently. The result of this work applies to the analysis of climate change; a correct classification is, therefore, important. In this paper, we used 18 texture features to distinguish 7 sky conditions. The important parameters of two classifiers are fine-tuned in the experiment, namely, k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) and artificial neural network (ANN). The performances of the two classifications were compared. Advantages and limitations of both classifiers were discussed. Our result revealed that the k-NN model performed at 72.99% accuracy while the ANN model has higher performance at 86.93% accuracy. We showed that our result is better than previous studies. Finally, seven most effective texture features are recommended to be used in the field of cloud type classification.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 931-932)

Pages:

1392-1396

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] W. C. K. Anuroj, Case Study of Stress from Thai Flood 2012, in School Age Student, Pathumthani Province, Thailand, R. Thai Airf. Med. Gaz., 58(1) (2012) 34–38.

Google Scholar

[2] G. Guangmeng, and Y. Jie, Three Attempts of Earthquake Prediction with Satellite Cloud Images, Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 13(1) (2013) 91–95.

DOI: 10.5194/nhess-13-91-2013

Google Scholar

[3] M. Singh, and M. Glennen, Automated Ground-Based Cloud Recognition, Pattern Anal. Appl., 8(3) (2005) 258–271.

DOI: 10.1007/s10044-005-0007-5

Google Scholar

[4] J. Calbó, and J. -A. González, Empirical Studies of Cloud Effects on UV Radiation: A Review, Rev. Geophys., 43(2) (2005).

DOI: 10.1029/2004rg000155

Google Scholar

[5] J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der LINDEN, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C. A. Johnson, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Cambridge Uni. Press, (2001).

DOI: 10.1002/qj.200212858119

Google Scholar

[6] J. A. Parikh, Automatic Cloud Classification and Segmentation, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, MD, USA, (1977).

Google Scholar

[7] A. Heinle, A. Macke, and A. Srivastav, Automatic Cloud Classification of Whole Sky Images, Atmospheric Meas. Tech. Discuss., 3(1) (2010) 269–299.

DOI: 10.5194/amt-3-557-2010

Google Scholar

[8] J. Calbo, and J. Sabburg, Feature Extraction from Whole-Sky Ground-Based Images for Cloud-Type Recognition, J. Atmospheric Ocean. Technol., 25(1) (2008) 3–14.

DOI: 10.1175/2007jtecha959.1

Google Scholar

[9] S. Liu, C. Wang, B. Xiao, Z. Zhang, and Y. Shao, Salient Local Binary Pattern for Ground-Based Cloud Classification, Acta Meteorol. Sin., 27 (2013) 211–220.

DOI: 10.1007/s13351-013-0206-8

Google Scholar

[10] C. N. Long, J. M. Sabburg, J. Calbó, and D. Pages, Retrieving Cloud Characteristics from Ground-Based Daytime Color All-Sky Images, JTECH, 23(5) (2006) 633–652.

DOI: 10.1175/jtech1875.1

Google Scholar

[11] K. B. Widener, and C. N. Long, All Sky Imager, U.S. Patent Application 10/377, 042. (2003).

Google Scholar

[12] M. P. Souza-Echer, E. B. Pereira, L. S. Bins, and M. A. R. Andrade, A Simple Method for the Assessment of the Cloud Cover State in High-Latitude Regions by a Ground-Based Digital Camera, J. Atmospheric Ocean. Technol., 23(3) (2006) 437–447.

DOI: 10.1175/jtech1833.1

Google Scholar

[13] R. M. Haralick, K. Shanmugam, and I. H. Dinstein, Textural Features for Image Classification, IEEE Trans. on Syst. Man Cybern., (6) (1973) 610–621.

DOI: 10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314

Google Scholar

[14] O. Veksler, Nonparametric Density Estimation Nearest Neighbors, KNN [Online], Available: http: /www. cs. haifa. ac. il/~rita/ml_course/lectures/KNN. pdf (2013).

Google Scholar

[15] I. H. Witten, and E. Frank, Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, second ed., Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, (2005).

DOI: 10.1186/1475-925x-5-51

Google Scholar

[16] I. Bonet, A. Rodríguez, R. Grau, M. M. García, Y. Saez, and A. Nowé, Comparing Distance Measures with Visual Methods, MICAI, AAI, Springer, California, 2008, p.90–99.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88636-5_8

Google Scholar

[17] B. Karlik, and A. V. Olgac, Performance Analysis of Various Activation Functions in Generalized MLP Architectures of Neural Networks, IJAE, 1(4) (2011) 111–122.

Google Scholar

[18] A. Kasapis, MLPs and Pose, Expression Classification, in Proc. of UNiS Report, (2003) 1-87.

Google Scholar