[1]
Arena, Mark V., Irv Blickstein, Obaid Younossi, and Clifford A. Grammich. 2006. Why Has the Cost of Navy Ships Risen?: A Macroscopic Examination of the Trends in U.S. Naval Ship Costs Over the Past Several Decades. MG-484-NAVY. RAND Corporation.
DOI: 10.7249/mg484
Google Scholar
[2]
Hope, Jan Paul. 1981. The process of naval ship general arrangement design and analysis., Naval Engineers Journal 93 (4): 29-38.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.1981.tb00657.x
Google Scholar
[3]
Jonathan M, Ross (2009), Human Factors for Naval Marine Vehicle Design and Operation- human factors in defence , Ashgate publishing company.
Google Scholar
[4]
ABS (2007), American Bureau of shipping homepage, http: /www. eagle. org/, downloaded September.
Google Scholar
[5]
ABS (2001), Guide for crew habitability on ships, American Bureau of shipping, Houston, TX, December.
Google Scholar
[6]
ABS (2001), Guide for passenger comfort ships, American Bureau of shipping, Houston, TX, December.
Google Scholar
[7]
Barry, D J, (1961), Management Approach to Functional Arrangement Design, Trans SNAME (1961).
Google Scholar
[8]
Baker, R, (1956), Habitability in Ships of the Royal Canadian Navy, Trans SNAME (1956).
Google Scholar
[9]
Leopold, R & Reuter, W, (1971), Three Winning Designs – FDL, LHA, DD963 Methods and Selected Features, Trans SNAME (1971).
Google Scholar
[10]
Carlson, C M & Fireman, H, (1987), General Arrangement Design Computer System and Methodology, U S Naval Engineers Journal, May (1987).
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.1987.tb02137.x
Google Scholar
[11]
Andrews, D, J, (1981), Creative Ship Design, Trans RINA (1981).
Google Scholar
[12]
Andrews, D, J, (1984), Synthesis in Ship Design, PhD , University of London, (1984).
Google Scholar
[13]
Singer, David J., Justin W. Gillespie, Hans Hopman, Etienne Duchateau, David Andrews, and Richard Pawling. 2012. Preliminary Ship Design General Arrangements Naval International Cooperative Opportunities in Science & Technology Program (NICOP) Project.
Google Scholar
[14]
Andrews, D, J, (1986), An Integrated Approach to Ship Synthesis, Trans RINA (1986).
Google Scholar
[15]
Daniels, A.S. & Parsons, M.G., Development of a Hybrid Agent-genetic Algorithm Approach to Ship Arrangements,. Ship Technology Research, 2008. 55(2): pp.78-86.
DOI: 10.1179/str.2008.55.2.004
Google Scholar
[16]
Nick, E.K. & Parsons, M.G. Fuzzy Optimal Allocation of Spaces to Zone-decks in General Arrangements, Proceedings of the Practical Design of Ship and Offshore Structures Conference. 2007. Houston, United States.
Google Scholar
[17]
Daniels, A.S., Tahmasbi, F., & Singer, D.J. Intelligent Ship Arrangement (ISA): Methodology - Improvements and Capability Enhancements, Proceedings of the 10th International Marine Design Conference. 2009. Trondheim, Norway.
Google Scholar
[18]
Nick, E.K., Parsons, M.G., & Nehrling, B. Fuzzy Optimal Allocation and Arrangement of Spaces in Naval Surface Ship Design, Proceedings of the 9th International Marine Design Conference. 2006. Ann Arbor, United States.
Google Scholar
[19]
Andrews, D .J. & Diks, C, The Building Block Design Methodology Applied to Advanced Naval Ship Design, Proceedings of the 6th International Marine Design Conference. 1997. Newcastle, UK.
Google Scholar
[20]
MUNOZ, J A & FORREST, C J M: - Advantages of Software Integration from Initial Design through to Production Design, ICCAS 2002, Malmo, Sept (2002).
Google Scholar
[21]
PAWLING, R, The Application of the Design Buidling Block Approach to Innovative Ship Design, PhD thesis, University College London, (2007).
Google Scholar
[22]
Andrews, D J & Pawling, R, SURFCON –A21st Century Ship Design Tool, IMDC 03, Athens, (2003).
Google Scholar
[23]
Andrews, D. J, (1998), A comprehensive methodology for the design of ships (and other complex systems), Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. (1998).
Google Scholar
[24]
Van Oers, B.J. A Packing Approach for the Early Stage Design of Service Vessels., PhD Thesis. Delft University of Technology, (2011).
Google Scholar
[25]
Van Oers, B.J., et al. Issues when Selecting Naval Ship Configurations from a Pareto-optimal Set., Proceedings of the 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: (2008).
DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-5886
Google Scholar
[26]
Van Oers, B.J., et al. A 3D Packing Approach for the Early Stage Configuration Design of Ships., Proceedings of the 10th International Naval Engineering Conference. Portsmouth, United Kingdom: (2010).
Google Scholar
[27]
Justin, W, Gillespie, A Network Science Approach to Understanding and Generating Ship Arrangements in Early-Stage Design, PhD thesis, University of Michigan, (2012).
Google Scholar
[28]
Lorenzo Casarosa, The integration of human factors, operability and personnel movement simulation into the preliminary design of ships utilising the Design Building Block approach.
Google Scholar
[29]
Andrews, D. J. and Pawling, R. G., 2004 Fast Mothership – A Design Challenge, RINA International.
Google Scholar
[30]
Cort, A., and W. Hills. 1987. Space layout design using computer assisted methods., Naval Engineers Journal 99 (3): 249–260.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.1987.tb02136.x
Google Scholar
[31]
Nick, Eleanor. 2008. Fuzzy Optimal Allocation and Arrangement of Spaces in NavalSurface Ship Design. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Michigan.
Google Scholar
[32]
Wagner, Karel, Alain Wassink, Bart van Oers, and Hans Hopman. 2010. Modeling Complex Vessels for Use in a 3D Packing Approach: An Application to Deepwater Drilling Vessel Design. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer and IT Applications in the Maritime Industries (COMPIT'10), 259-272. Gubbio, Italy.
Google Scholar