Design Methodologies of Ship General Arrangements - A Review

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents an overview of ship general arrangement design methodologies and philosophies and early-stage design capabilities, particularly during the last decade. The arrangement of a ship has a unique feature in that it can both enable successful shipboard operations and constrain the performance of all subsystems. Stable ship layout is critical to producible, and therefore cost effective, designs and time. This paper overviews the efforts made by the researchers in the last decade to improve generating the arrangement rapidly . Also, identify areas of the ship general arrangements process that are insufficiently addressed or not addressed at all in order to keep pushing the field of general arrangements forward.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2344-2351

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Arena, Mark V., Irv Blickstein, Obaid Younossi, and Clifford A. Grammich. 2006. Why Has the Cost of Navy Ships Risen?: A Macroscopic Examination of the Trends in U.S. Naval Ship Costs Over the Past Several Decades. MG-484-NAVY. RAND Corporation.

DOI: 10.7249/mg484

Google Scholar

[2] Hope, Jan Paul. 1981. The process of naval ship general arrangement design and analysis., Naval Engineers Journal 93 (4): 29-38.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.1981.tb00657.x

Google Scholar

[3] Jonathan M, Ross (2009), Human Factors for Naval Marine Vehicle Design and Operation- human factors in defence , Ashgate publishing company.

Google Scholar

[4] ABS (2007), American Bureau of shipping homepage, http: /www. eagle. org/, downloaded September.

Google Scholar

[5] ABS (2001), Guide for crew habitability on ships, American Bureau of shipping, Houston, TX, December.

Google Scholar

[6] ABS (2001), Guide for passenger comfort ships, American Bureau of shipping, Houston, TX, December.

Google Scholar

[7] Barry, D J, (1961), Management Approach to Functional Arrangement Design, Trans SNAME (1961).

Google Scholar

[8] Baker, R, (1956), Habitability in Ships of the Royal Canadian Navy, Trans SNAME (1956).

Google Scholar

[9] Leopold, R & Reuter, W, (1971), Three Winning Designs – FDL, LHA, DD963 Methods and Selected Features, Trans SNAME (1971).

Google Scholar

[10] Carlson, C M & Fireman, H, (1987), General Arrangement Design Computer System and Methodology, U S Naval Engineers Journal, May (1987).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.1987.tb02137.x

Google Scholar

[11] Andrews, D, J, (1981), Creative Ship Design, Trans RINA (1981).

Google Scholar

[12] Andrews, D, J, (1984), Synthesis in Ship Design, PhD , University of London, (1984).

Google Scholar

[13] Singer, David J., Justin W. Gillespie, Hans Hopman, Etienne Duchateau, David Andrews, and Richard Pawling. 2012. Preliminary Ship Design General Arrangements Naval International Cooperative Opportunities in Science & Technology Program (NICOP) Project.

Google Scholar

[14] Andrews, D, J, (1986), An Integrated Approach to Ship Synthesis, Trans RINA (1986).

Google Scholar

[15] Daniels, A.S. & Parsons, M.G., Development of a Hybrid Agent-genetic Algorithm Approach to Ship Arrangements,. Ship Technology Research, 2008. 55(2): pp.78-86.

DOI: 10.1179/str.2008.55.2.004

Google Scholar

[16] Nick, E.K. & Parsons, M.G. Fuzzy Optimal Allocation of Spaces to Zone-decks in General Arrangements, Proceedings of the Practical Design of Ship and Offshore Structures Conference. 2007. Houston, United States.

Google Scholar

[17] Daniels, A.S., Tahmasbi, F., & Singer, D.J. Intelligent Ship Arrangement (ISA): Methodology - Improvements and Capability Enhancements, Proceedings of the 10th International Marine Design Conference. 2009. Trondheim, Norway.

Google Scholar

[18] Nick, E.K., Parsons, M.G., & Nehrling, B. Fuzzy Optimal Allocation and Arrangement of Spaces in Naval Surface Ship Design, Proceedings of the 9th International Marine Design Conference. 2006. Ann Arbor, United States.

Google Scholar

[19] Andrews, D .J. & Diks, C, The Building Block Design Methodology Applied to Advanced Naval Ship Design, Proceedings of the 6th International Marine Design Conference. 1997. Newcastle, UK.

Google Scholar

[20] MUNOZ, J A & FORREST, C J M: - Advantages of Software Integration from Initial Design through to Production Design, ICCAS 2002, Malmo, Sept (2002).

Google Scholar

[21] PAWLING, R, The Application of the Design Buidling Block Approach to Innovative Ship Design, PhD thesis, University College London, (2007).

Google Scholar

[22] Andrews, D J & Pawling, R, SURFCON –A21st Century Ship Design Tool, IMDC 03, Athens, (2003).

Google Scholar

[23] Andrews, D. J, (1998), A comprehensive methodology for the design of ships (and other complex systems), Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. (1998).

Google Scholar

[24] Van Oers, B.J. A Packing Approach for the Early Stage Design of Service Vessels., PhD Thesis. Delft University of Technology, (2011).

Google Scholar

[25] Van Oers, B.J., et al. Issues when Selecting Naval Ship Configurations from a Pareto-optimal Set., Proceedings of the 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: (2008).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-5886

Google Scholar

[26] Van Oers, B.J., et al. A 3D Packing Approach for the Early Stage Configuration Design of Ships., Proceedings of the 10th International Naval Engineering Conference. Portsmouth, United Kingdom: (2010).

Google Scholar

[27] Justin, W, Gillespie, A Network Science Approach to Understanding and Generating Ship Arrangements in Early-Stage Design, PhD thesis, University of Michigan, (2012).

Google Scholar

[28] Lorenzo Casarosa, The integration of human factors, operability and personnel movement simulation into the preliminary design of ships utilising the Design Building Block approach.

Google Scholar

[29] Andrews, D. J. and Pawling, R. G., 2004 Fast Mothership – A Design Challenge, RINA International.

Google Scholar

[30] Cort, A., and W. Hills. 1987. Space layout design using computer assisted methods., Naval Engineers Journal 99 (3): 249–260.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.1987.tb02136.x

Google Scholar

[31] Nick, Eleanor. 2008. Fuzzy Optimal Allocation and Arrangement of Spaces in NavalSurface Ship Design. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Michigan.

Google Scholar

[32] Wagner, Karel, Alain Wassink, Bart van Oers, and Hans Hopman. 2010. Modeling Complex Vessels for Use in a 3D Packing Approach: An Application to Deepwater Drilling Vessel Design. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer and IT Applications in the Maritime Industries (COMPIT'10), 259-272. Gubbio, Italy.

Google Scholar