Quantitative Risk Assessment and Early Warning for pH Value of Disqualified Imported Textile

Article Preview

Abstract:

The assessment of potential risks posed by PH value in clothing to consumers is of increasing concern worldwide. If the PH value is too high, it is harmful to skin. Some papers focus on hazard assessment and exposure assessment, using quantitative and semi-quantitative method, rather than assessment for the factors related to the PH value. In order to perform early-warning research and risk management, the quantitative risk assessment is used in this paper to analyze the imported textile testing data and find the factors related to the PH value. The data mining technique and K-means algorithm is the core of the method. It can be concluded that the disqualified textiles have relations with main fiber components and fabric color. Then cluster the data by K-means algorithm for every factor, define the different class as related danger level, respectively severe, moderate, light.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2358-2363

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. The report of National quality status for imported apparel products [R]. China: AQSIQ, (2011).

Google Scholar

[2] P. G. Zweers, S. Gunnarsdóttir, T.G. Vermeire, T.P. Traas, M. Koers-Jacquemijns and D. T. Sijm, Verification of a REACH Environmental Prioritization System Against Regulatory Risk Indices, Hum Ecol Risk Assess, 19, 4(2013) 1049-1066.

DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2012.691404

Google Scholar

[3] M. H. Schmid-Wendtner and H. C. Korting, The PH of the skin surface and its impact on the barrier function, Skin Pharmacol Physiol, 19, 6(2006) 296–302.

DOI: 10.1159/000094670

Google Scholar

[4] F. C Daia, C. F Lee and Y. Y Ngai, Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview, Eng Geol, 64, 1(2002) 65–87.

Google Scholar

[5] Information on http: /echa. europa. eu.

Google Scholar

[6] T. Aven, Quantitative risk assessment: the scientific platform, CU Press, New York, (2011).

Google Scholar

[7] H.H. Einstein, R. L. Sousa, K. Karam, I. Manzella and V. Kveldsvik, Rock slopes from mechanics to decision making, CRC Press, London, (2010).

DOI: 10.1201/b10550-3

Google Scholar

[8] T. J. Crowe, P. M. Fong, T.A. Bauman and J. L. Zayas-Castro, Quantitative risk level estimation of business process reengineering efforts, J. Bus. Process. Manag. 8, 5(2001) 490-511.

DOI: 10.1108/14637150210449148

Google Scholar

[9] H.S. Phillips, S. Kharbanda, R. Chen, W. F. Forrest, R.H. Soriano, T.D. Wu, A. Misra, J.M. Nigro, H. Colman, L. Soroceanu, P.M. Williams, Z. Modrusan B.G. Feuerstein and  K. Aldape, Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis, Cancer Cell, 9, 3(2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.02.019

Google Scholar

[10] W. Xue and H. G. Chen, Data mining based on Clementine, RUC Press, Beijing, (2012).

Google Scholar

[11] A.K. Jain, Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means, Pattern Recogn Lett, 31, 8(2010) 651–666.

DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011

Google Scholar

[12] B. R. Babu, A.K. Parande, S. Raghu and T. P. Kumar, Cotton textile processing: waste generation and effluent treatment, J. Cot. Sci, 11(2007) 141–153.

Google Scholar