Tensile Property of Electrochemically Polished Titanium Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

Tensile tests of titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) with different thickness of 0.4 mm and 0.3 mm, were performed to investigate thickness dependency of superplasticity. To keep the same inner microstructure between specimens with different thicknesses, electrochemical polishing method was applied to reduce thickness. By keeping the voltage for the electrochemical polishing as 30 V the thickness decreased as linear with respect to polishing time. Further, tensile tests of 0.4 mm with strain rate 9.310-4 sec-1 were conducted at room temperature and 850 °C. And the superplasticity of 450 % elongation was obtained at 850 °C. For quantitative measurement of superplasticity, strain rate sensitivity (m value) was calculated from the tensile test by changing strain rate. The m values of the unpolished 0.4 mm specimen and the polished 0.3 mm specimen were 0.52 and 0.43, respectively. Strain rates to calculate the m value were 510-4 sec-1 and 110-3 sec-1. Consequently the reduction of thickness resulted in the reduction of m value, which means less superplasticity for thinner sheets of Ti-6Al-4V.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

146-151

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Geiger, M. Kleiner, R. Eckstein, N. Tiesler, U. Engel, CIRP Annals, Manufacturing Technology, 50 (2001) 445-462.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)62991-6

Google Scholar

[2] T. Hanawa, Journal of The Japan Institute of Light Metals, 62 (2012), 285-290.

Google Scholar

[3] F. Vollertsen, D. Biermann, I.S. Jawahir, K. Kuzman, CIRP Annals, Manufacturing Technology, 58 (2009) 566-587.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.002

Google Scholar

[4] S. Miyazaki, K. Shibata, H. Fujita, Acta Metallurgica, Vol. 27, 855-862.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Sieniawski, M. Motyka, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 24 (2007) 123-130.

Google Scholar

[6] J. D. Beal, R. Boyer, D. Sanders, ASM Handbook, 14B: Metalworking: Sheet Forming, 656-669.

DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v14b.a0005146

Google Scholar

[7] N. Morita, Abstracts of the Journal of Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices, 9 (1990), 218-239.

Google Scholar

[8] J. W. Edington, K. N. Melton, C. P. Cutler, Progress in Materials Science, 21 (1976) 61-170.

Google Scholar