Comparison of Mechanical Properties of 357-T6 Aluminum Alloy Aast under Gravity Permanent Casting and Low Pressure Die Casting

Article Preview

Abstract:

357-T6 is an alloy that has been widely used due to excellent casting properties and mechanical performances. The aluminum wheels can be cast with both permanent and low pressure die castings. In this study, the mechanical properties of 357-T6 were compared between the gravity permanent casting (GPC) and low pressure die casting (LPDC). The specimens were cast through permanent and LPDC processes, respectively and were heat treated under T6, with different aging temperatures 155°C, 165°C, 175°C and 185°C after the solution treatment of 545°C for 9 hours. The ultimate tensile strength and elongation were tested for both processes. The results show that both tensile and elongation of low pressure die casting specimens are higher remarkably than those in gravity permanent casting. The optimized aging parameter is heating at 175°C for 4.5 hours after solution treatment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 941-944)

Pages:

77-80

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Nikolaos D. Alexopoulos, Antonis Stylianos, John Campbell, Dynamic fracture toughness of Al–7Si–Mg (A357) aluminum alloy. Mechanics of Materials, 58 (2013) 55-68.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.11.005

Google Scholar

[2] G.S. Mousavi, M. Emamy, J. Rassizadehghani, The effect of mischmetal and heat treatment on the microstructure and tensile properties of A357 Al–Si casting alloy, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 556 ( 2012) 573-581.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.07.029

Google Scholar

[3] L. Ceschini, Alessandro Morri, Andrea Morri, A. Gamberini, S. Messieri, Correlation between ultimate tensile strength and solidification microstructure for the sand cast A357 aluminum alloy, Materials & Design, 30 (2009) 4525-4531.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.012

Google Scholar

[4] A. Razaghian, M. Emamy, A.A. Najimi, S.H. Seyed Ebrahimi, Sr effect on the microstructure and tensile properties of A357 aluminum alloy and Al2O3/SiC-A357 cast composites. Materials Characterization, 60 (2009) 1361-1369.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2009.06.008

Google Scholar

[5] Paul W. Cleary, Extension of SPH to predict feeding, freezing and defect creation in low pressure die casting, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34 (2010) 3189-3201.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.02.012

Google Scholar

[6] A.E. Miller, D.M. Maijer, Investigation of erosive-corrosive wear in the low pressure die casting of aluminum A, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 435–436 (2006) 100-111.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.052

Google Scholar