Effects of pH on Hg0 Re-Emission in WFGD

Article Preview

Abstract:

Gaseous oxidized mercury (Hg2+) in the flue gas is soluble in water and can be captured effectively by Wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) system. But in some extent Hg0 re-emission happens due to the reduction of absorbed Hg2+, and the pH of slurry is an important factor affecting Hg0 re-emission. In this study, the theoretical formulas of slurry pH were derived through the conventional solution theory and then were used to evaluate the factors determining the pH of slurry. A series of laboratory experiments were carried out under N2, CO2 and O2/N2 atmosphere to measure the Hg0 re-emission tendency at different pH values. The results show that the higher the pH, the less Hg2+ reduced by S(IV), resulting in the decrease of Hg0 re-emission. Under N2 atmosphere, the Hg0 re-emission was mild at pH>4 while it was dramatic at pH<4. Under O2/N2 atmosphere, the addition of O2 extended the time span of Hg0 re-emission at low pH and increased Hg0 re-emission unexpectedly in the latter part of the experiments at high pH. CO2 atmosphere almost did not affect Hg0 re-emission because of its little effect on the slurry pH.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 960-961)

Pages:

462-468

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C.L. Wu, Y. Cao, Z.B. Dong, C.M. Cheng, H.X. Li and W.P. Pan: Journal of Coal Science & EngineeringVol. 16(2010), pp.82-87.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Dίaz-Somoano,S. Unterberger and K.R.G. Hein: Fuel Processing TechnologyVol. 88(2007), pp.259-263.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.10.003

Google Scholar

[3] Q.W. Hou R.G. Shi Y.C. Li and S.B. Gao: Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science) Vol. 35(2005), pp.37-38.

Google Scholar

[4] N. Omine, C.E. Romero, H. Kikkawa, S. Wu and S. Eswaran: FuelVol. 91(2012), pp.93-101.

Google Scholar

[5] C.L. Wu, Y. Cao, W.P. Pan, Z.B. Dong and W.P. Pan: Fuel Vol. 89(2010), p.2072-(2080).

Google Scholar

[6] J. Schuetze, D. Kunth, S. Weissbachand H. Koeser: Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol. 46 (2012), pp.3008-3013.

Google Scholar

[7] R. Ochoa-González, M. Díaz-Somoano and M.R. Martínez-Tarazona: Chemical Engineering JournalVol. 214(2013), pp.165-171.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.037

Google Scholar

[8] J.J. Wo, M. Zhang, X.Y. Cheng, X.H. Zhong, J. Xu and X.H. Xu: Journal of Hazardous MaterialsVol. 172(2009), p.1106–1110.

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Liu, Y.J. Wang, Z.B. Wu,S.Y. Zhou and H.Q. Wang: FuelVol. 90(2011), pp.2501-2507.

Google Scholar

[10] W. Shao: Zhejiang Electric Power(2009), pp.82-83, in chinese.

Google Scholar

[11] B.B. Hansen,F. Fogh N.O. Knudsenand S. Kiil: Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. Vol. 50(2011), pp.4238-4244.

Google Scholar

[12] W. Pasiuk-Bronikowska and K.J. Rudzinski: Chemical Engineering ScienceVol. 46(1991), pp.2281-2291.

Google Scholar

[13] J. Munthe, Z.F. Xiao andO. Lindqvist: Water: Air, and Soil PollutionVol. 56(1991), pp.621-630.

Google Scholar

[14] W. Huo: Mechanism of oxidation, absorption and crystallization in limestone-gypsum wet desulfurization process [D]. PhD thesis, Zhejiang University(2009).

Google Scholar

[15] H. Kong: Experimental and theoretical studies in limestone FGD technology [D]. PhD thesis, Zhejiang University(2001).

Google Scholar