Experimental Research on Heat Transfer of Closed Cooling Tower with Packing

Article Preview

Abstract:

Three different structural types of closed cooling tower (CCT) and two cooling water flow directions were considered. The experimental study were done on the cooling performance of influences of inlet air dry and wet bulb temperature, cooling water flow rate and inlet temperature, air flow rate and spray density. The experimental results show that the cooling performance of CCT with packing is obviously better than non-packing cooling tower in 7%~18.4%. And the cooling performance of CCT with packing on top and coil underneath is slightly better than CCT with coil on top and packing underneath in 4.9%. In the same conditions the cooling performance of CCT with packing under cooling water cocurrent-flow is better than that cooling water countercurrent-flow in 3.2%~9.6%. Therefore, the closed cooling tower structure with the cooling water path in bottom and out top, and with packing on top and coil underneath is recommended.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 960-961)

Pages:

614-620

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R.C. Rosaler, The Standard Handbook of Plant Engineering, seconded., McGraw-Hill, New York, (1995).

Google Scholar

[2] D.W. Green, R.H. Perry, Perry's Chemical Engineers Handbook, sixth ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, (1984).

Google Scholar

[3] M.M.A. Sarker, E. Kim, C.G. Moon, J.I. Yoon, Performance characteristics of the hybrid closed circuit cooling tower. Energy and Buildings, 2008, 40 (8): 1529–1535.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.02.010

Google Scholar

[4] M.M.A. Sarker, E. Kim, C.G. Moon, J.I. Yoon, Thermal performance characteristics of closed-wet cooling tower. Journal of Korean Society forPower System Engineering, 2005, 9 (2): 88–92.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Hasan, K. Sirén, Performance investigation of plain and finned tube evaporative cooledheat exchangers. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2002, 23(3): 325~340.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-4311(02)00194-1

Google Scholar

[6] A. Hasan, K. Sirén, Performance investigation of plain circular and oval tube evaporative cooled heat exchangers. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2004, 24(3): 777~790.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2003.10.022

Google Scholar

[7] P.J. Erens, Comparison of some design choices for evaporative cooler cores. Heat transfer engineering, 1988, (9): 29~35.

DOI: 10.1080/01457638808939663

Google Scholar

[8] T. Ravi Kiran, S.P.S. Rajput, An effectiveness model for an indirect evaporative cooling (IEC) system: Comparison of artificial neural networks (ANN), adaptive neuron-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and fuzzy inference system (FIS) approach. Applied Soft Computing, 2011, 11(4): 3525–3533.

DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2011.01.025

Google Scholar