Managing Clear-Cutting Forest for Carbon Sequestration in Living Biomass: A Case Study in Subtropical of China

Article Preview

Abstract:

Forest reconstruction was regarded as a measure of carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation. The carbon stocks in living biomass were compared between artificial measures promoting regeneration of Castanopsis carlesii (ARC) and two adjacent plantations of Cunninghamia lanceolata (CFP) and Pinus massoniana (PMP) and natural primary forest (NPF). The mean carbon stocks were about 150.1 Mg ha-1 in ARC and 90.6 Mg ha-1 in CFP and 83.9 Mg ha-1 in PMP. The results primarily showed that the carbon stock in artificial measures promoting regeneration were higher than that two plantations. Carbon stocks in the all reconstruction of forests were all significantly lower than those of NPF (186.9 Mg ha-1), which also implies they still have a carbon sink increment potential.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 962-965)

Pages:

1342-1346

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Zhao, W. Xiang, X. Deng, D. Tian, Z. Huang, X. Zhou, G. Yu, H. He, C. Peng. Ecological Modelling Vol. 250 (2013), p.58.

Google Scholar

[2] Z. Guo, J. Fang, Y. Pan & R. Birdsey. Forest Ecol Mang Vol. 259 (2010), p.1225.

Google Scholar

[3] C. Arevalo, J. S. Bhatti, S. X. Chang & D. Sidders. Agr Ecosyst Environ Vol. 141 (2011), p.342.

Google Scholar

[4] I. Lestariningsih & K. Hairiah. Procedia Soc Behav Sci Vol. 17 (2013), p.172.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Giménez-Morera, A. Cerdà & P. Pereira. Geophysical Research Vol. 16 (2014).

Google Scholar

[6] Qinglin Huang, Yuanhong Li. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry (1998), p.225(in chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Zhao Deng. Forest Engineering Vol. 15 (1999), p.10 (in chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] Jingzhong. Ye, Zhilin. Jiang, Benlin. Zhou. Journal of nanjing forestry college Vol. 4 (1984), p.1 (in chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Shourong Wu, Huiqiang Yang, Rong Hong. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology Vol. 26(1) (1999), p.18(in chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] R. F. Nelson, D. S. Kimes, W. A. Salas, M. Routhier. Bioscience Vol. 50 (2000), p.419.

Google Scholar

[11] L. Finér, H. Mannerkoski, S. Piirainen & M. Starr. Forest Ecol Mang Vol. 174 (2003), p.51.

Google Scholar

[12] P. Laclau. Forest Ecol Mang Vol. 180 (2003), p.317.

Google Scholar

[13] Y. B. Di, H. M. Wang, Z. Q. Ma. Chin Sci Bull (Chin Ver) Vol. 57 (2012), p.1553.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Zheng, Z. Ouyang, W. Xu, X. Wang, H. Miao, X. Li , Y. Tian. Forest Ecol Mang Vol. 255 (2008), p.1113.

Google Scholar

[15] E. Cuevas, S. Brown, A. E. Lugo. Plant Soil Vol. 135 (1991), p.257.

Google Scholar

[16] C. Liao, Y. Luo, C. Fang, B. Li. Plos one Vol. 5 (2010), p. e10867.

Google Scholar

[17] Gongfu Ye. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry Vol. 3 (1992), p.10 (in chinese).

Google Scholar