Carbon Emission Calculation of Thermal Power Plant - An Overview

Article Preview

Abstract:

Thermal power industry is one of the six biggest carbon emissions industries in China. Researchers did innumerable studies in reducing carbon emissions of thermal power plants (TPP). However, most studies are focused on the calculation and prediction of China's total carbon emissions, while few studies are focused on specific TPP carbon emissions. There are 3 parts in developing this paper; first, the main ideas of the project life cycle’s calculation methods, construction periods and operation periods are summarized. Secondly, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) carbon emission factor mode, practical measurement mode, mass conservation mode and quantifying mode are discussed in detail. This paper aims to determine the optimal development path for thermal plants through the detailed discussion of the existing research results of a specific TPP project’s carbon emissions issue.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 962-965)

Pages:

1368-1372

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Gurney, KR. Global change: China at the carbon crossroads. Nature, (2009)Vol. 458, 977–979.

Google Scholar

[2] Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency(NEAA). China now No. 1 in CO2 emissions; USA in second position. The Netherlands Press. Bilthoven, Netherlands.

Google Scholar

[3] CEPEI. Thermal Power Engineering Design Handbook 2010. China Power Engineering Consulting Group Corporation, China Electric Power Press. Beijing, China.

Google Scholar

[4] U.S. Energy Information Administration(EIA). World carbon dioxide emissions from the consumption and flaring of fossil fuels, 1980–2005. Energy Information Administration Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting U.S. Department of Energ Press. Washington, DC, American.

DOI: 10.2172/10141487

Google Scholar

[5] Jiang,Z. Reflections on energy issues in China. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), Vol. 13, 257–274.

DOI: 10.1007/s12204-008-0257-7

Google Scholar

[6] Mao,Y., Sheng,H. and Yang,F. The true cost of coal. Greenpeace, The China Sustainable Energy Program, World Wide Fund for Nature press. Beijing, China.

Google Scholar

[7] Yuhuan, Genga., Mingzhong, Tian., Qiuan, Zhu., Jianjun, Zhang. and Changhui, Peng. Quantification of provincial-level carbon emissions from energy consumption in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 15, 3658–3668.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.005

Google Scholar

[8] Young, Chang,K., Byong, Hun,A. Multicriteria generation-expansion planning with global environmental considerations. IEEE Trans on Engineering Management, Vol. 40, 154-161.

DOI: 10.1109/17.277407

Google Scholar

[9] Qixin,C., Chongqing,K., Qing, X, et al. Power generation expansion planning model towards low-carbon economy and its application in China. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, Vol. 25, 1117-1125.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2009.2036925

Google Scholar

[10] Meza J.L.C., Yildirim M.B. and Masud A.S.M. A model for the multiperiod multiobjective power generation expansion problem. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, Vol. 22, 871-878.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2007.895178

Google Scholar

[11] Rebennack S, Flach B, Pereira MVF, et al. Stochastic hydro-thermal scheduling under emissions constraints. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, Vol. 27, 58-68.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2011.2140342

Google Scholar

[12] Rong, Fu, S,. Lin,C., Yong, Hua. S, et al. Generation expansion planning based on multi-area reliability exponential analytic model and emission control. IEEE Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition, 1-6.

DOI: 10.1109/tdc.2008.4517104

Google Scholar

[13] Careri,F., Genesi,C., Marannino,P., et. al. Generation expansion planning in the age of green economy. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, Vol. 26, 2214-2223.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2011.2107753

Google Scholar

[14] R. Pachauri. The Future in Our Hands, Presentation by the Chairman of IPCC. UN. NewYork, < http: /www. ipcc. ch/>.

Google Scholar

[15] B. Tonn. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: a global scale transformative initiative. Futures, Vol. 39, 614–618.

DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2006.10.010

Google Scholar

[16] National Bureau of Statistics Division and Bureau for Conrprehensive National Energy Board. China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2008. China Statistics Press, Beijing, China.

Google Scholar

[17] Haiqin, Yu., Jin, Li., Hongguang, An., Qingchao, Wei., Xiujun, Tian. and Rui, Chen. Analysis on Carbon Dioxide Emission and Reduction of Thermal Power Plant. Journal of Beijing jiao tong university, Vol. 34, 101-105.

Google Scholar

[18] European Environment Agency(EEA). Core inventory of air emissions. group 01(1): Combustion in energy and transformation industries. EEA Press. Copenhagen , Denmark.

Google Scholar

[19] United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). Compilation of air pollutant emission factors, chapter 1: External combustion sources. EPA Press. New York, America.

Google Scholar

[20] S. Baumgärtner.,H. Dyckhoff.,M. Fabe. r,J. Proops. and J. Schiller. The concept of joint production and ecological economics. Ecological Economics, Vol. 36, 365-372.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00260-3

Google Scholar

[21] U. Ebert.,H. Welsch. Environmental emissions and production economics: implications of the materials balance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 89, 287-293.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.00997.x

Google Scholar

[22] Hendriks,C., Sophie A., Der, Waart,V., et al. Building the cost curves for CO2 storage, part 1: sources of CO2. IEA green . Gloucestershire, <http: /www. ieagreen. org. uk/2005/html>.

Google Scholar

[23] Bing, Bai., Xiaochun, Li., Yanfeng, Liu., et al. Preliminary Study on CO2 Industrial Point Sources and Their Distribution In China. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 25, 2918-2922.

Google Scholar