Effect of Reclamation on the Vertical Distribution of SOC in Three Types of Wetland Soils

Article Preview

Abstract:

To investigate how reclamation of wetlands in three different soil types impacts the vertical distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) content in soil profiles, contents and density of soil organic carbon (SOC) in soil profiles of three types of wetland soils in wetland, soybean and paddy field in Sanjiang Plain were determined. Both soybean and paddy field were reclaimed from wetland. We observed that reclamation significantly reduced SOC content in 0-10,10-20 and 20-30 cm soil layers in meadow albic soil and meadow marsh soil, and 0-10,10-20,20-30 and 30-40 cm soil layers in peat bog soil, there were no significant difference in SOC contents in soil layers under 0-30 or 0-40 cm before and after reclamation. After reclamation, SOC density in three types of wetland soils decreased, and SOC density in soybean field were higher than that in paddy field. Either in wetlands or farm lands in the three types of wetland soils, most of the SOC storage in 0-100 cm soil layer was stored in 0-50 cm soil layer. Though wetland reclamation reduced the SOC content, it hasn’t changed the regularity of SOC vertical distribution. The relationships between SOC content and soil depth in wetlands and farm lands all could be described by exponential functions in three types of soils. The specific functions are useful to estimate and predict the regional SOC pool by models.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 962-965)

Pages:

1386-1391

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] W M Post and L K Mann. Changes in soil organic carbon and nitrogen as a result of cultivation [A]. Soils and Greenhouse Effect [C]. Proceedings of the International Conference, Chichester Wily, (1990), pp.401-406.

Google Scholar

[2] E T Sundquist. Science, 259: 935-941(1993).

Google Scholar

[3] J Meersmans, B Vanwesemael, F Deridder, et al. Global Change Biology, 15: 2739-2750(2009).

Google Scholar

[4] R T Conant and K Paustian. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16(4): 1143(2002).

Google Scholar

[5] K Lorenz and R Lal. Advances in Agronomy, 88: 35-66(2005).

Google Scholar

[6] W T Baisden and R L Parfitt. Biochemistry, 85: 59-68(2007).

Google Scholar

[7] N H Batjes. European Journal of Soil Science, 47: 151-163(1996).

Google Scholar

[8] S Fontaine, S Barot, P Barre´, et al. Nature, 450(8): 277-281(2007).

Google Scholar

[9] Shaoqlang Wang, Mei Huang, Xuemei Shao, et al. Environmental Management, 33: 200-209(2004).

Google Scholar

[10] Tao Zeng. The evaluation, monitor and developing research for the eco-tourism resources of Xingkai Lake. Herbin, Northeast Forestry University. (2010).

Google Scholar

[11] Soil Science Society of Professional Committee of Agricultural Soil of China. Conventional method of soil agricultural chemistry [M]. Beijing: Science and Technology Press, 33(1983). In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[12] Lili Wang, Changchun Song, ruijuan Ge, et al. China Environmental Science, 29(6):656-66(2009). In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[13] C Rumpel and I Kögel-Knabner. Plant and Soil, 338: 143-158(2011).

Google Scholar

[14] Gangqi Chen, Niu huan-guang, Lv xian-guo. Research of wetland in the Sanjiang Plain [M]. Beijing: China Science Press, 17-18(1996). In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[15] K Kalbitz, S Solinger, J H Park, et al. Soil Science, 165(4): 277-304(2000).

Google Scholar

[16] Genxing Pan Lianqing Li Jufeng Zheng, et al. Perspectives on cycling and sequestion of organic carbon in paddy soils of China[M]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 45(5): 901-914(2008). In Chinese.

Google Scholar