Paper Titles

Influence of N₂ Proportion on Mechanical Properties of SiCN Thin Films Prepared by DIBSD
p.1243

Research of Contact Pressure of an Elastoplastic Rough Body in Contact with a Smooth Rigid Plane
p.1248

A Study on Diffusion in Hot-Dip Aluminizing
p.1253

Experimental Study on Surface Roughness and Residual Stress by End Milling 69111-Stainless Steel
p.1257

Substrate Roughness Effects on Chromium Oxide Coating Adhesion and Wear Resistance
p.1261

A Three-dimensional Finite Element Method for Surface Effects
p.1265

Characteristics of Fretting Wear in a Press-Fitted Shaft Subjected to Bending Load
p.1269

Wavelets-Based Feature Extraction for Texture Classification
p.1273

Experimental Study on Fracture Behavior of UHTCC Overlay/Concrete Interfaces under Mixed-Mode Loading
p.1277

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 97-101Substrate Roughness Effects on Chromium Oxide...

Substrate Roughness Effects on Chromium Oxide Coating Adhesion and Wear Resistance

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effects of high speed steel substrate roughness on adhesion and wear behavior of reactive sputtered chromium oxide coatings was investigated using scratch and tribological tests. While coating adhesion slightly increased, its wear rate deceased with substrate roughness increase from 2 to 38 nm.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Manufacturing Science and Engineering I

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 97-101)

Pages:

1261-1264

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.97-101.1261

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2010

Authors:

Fei Lou, Xiao Lu Pang, Ke Wei Gao, Chun Hu Tao

Keywords:

Adhesion, Chromium Oxide Coating, Surface Roughness (SR), Wear Resistance

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] E. Soutry, J.L. Sullivan and M.D. Bijker: Tribology International Forum Vol. 36(2003), p.389.

[2] H Ahn, O Kwon: Wear Forum Vol. 225-229(1999), p.814.

[3] M. Bromark, M. Larsson, P. Hedenqvist, M. l Olsson and S. Hogmark: Surf. Coat. Technol. Forum Vol. 52(1992), p.195.

[4] P. Harlin, P. Carlsson, U. Bexell and M. Olsson: Surf. Coat. Technol. Forum Vol. 201(2006), p.4253.

[5] F. Svahn, A. K. Ruddhpi and E. Wallen: Wear Forum Vol. 254(2003), p.1092.

[6] S.J. bull, D.S. Rickerby: Surf. Coat. Technol. Forum Vol. 41(1990), p.269.

[7] B. Podgomik, S. Hogmark and O. Sandberg: Surf. Coat. Technol. Forum Vol. 184(2004), p.338.

[8] Z. Liu, X. Fang, B. Liu and W. Ling: Sci. Engneer. of Testing Forum Vol. 2 (2006), p.31.

[9] X . Zhang, H. Fan and W: Advanced Technology and Technics Forum Vol. 2 (2003), p.42.

[10] D.L. Mcdowell: Engineering Fracture Mechanics Forum Vol. 56(1997), p.357.

[11] P. Burnett, D. Rickersby: Thin Solid Films Forum Vol. 154(1987), p.403.

[12] H. Weiss: Surf. Coat. Technol. Forum Vol. 71(1995), p.201.

[13] K. H. Zum Cahr, C. Bogdanow and J. Schneider: Wear Forum Vol. ; 181-183(1995), p.118.