Relationship of Three Rock Parameters

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to solve complex problems of traditional methods used to evaluate the rock fracability, the relationship between fractal dimension, rock brittleness and fracture density these three parameters was studied. The multiple linear regression is reasonable through nine kinds cores. The regression coefficients demonstrate both rock brittleness and surface fracture density play positive roles on fractal dimension value, the larger they are, the better the fracability. Therefore, the two parameters can be converted to consider only one parameter that is the fractal dimension of rock. The larger the fractal dimension, the better the fracability is, that is using fractal dimension represents brittle index and surface density to participate in fracability evaluation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 986-987)

Pages:

2176-2179

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] KASSIS S, SONDERGELD C H. Fracture permeability of gas shale: effects of roughness, fracture offset proppant, and effective stress. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal Vol. 131376 (2010), pp.1-17.

DOI: 10.2118/131376-ms

Google Scholar

[2] Tang Y, Xing Y, Li L, et al Influence factors and evaluation method of the gas shale fracability. Earth Science Frontiers Vol. 19(5) (2012), pp.356-363.

Google Scholar

[3] Matthews HL, Schein G, Malone M. Stimulation of gas shales: They're all the same-right[C]/SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. Texas, UAS: Society of Petroleum Engineers (2007).

DOI: 10.2118/106070-ms

Google Scholar

[4] Guo TK, Zhang SC, Ge HK. A new method for evaluating ability of forming fracture network in shale reservoir, Rock and Soil Mechanics Vol. 34(2013), p.947.

Google Scholar

[5] Matthews HL, Schein G, Malone M Stimulation of gas shales: They're all the same-right[C]/SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. Texas, UAS: Society of Petroleum (2007).

DOI: 10.2118/106070-ms

Google Scholar

[6] Wu QH, Li XB, Liu HL, et al. Log interpretations and the application of core testingtechnology in the shale-gas: Taking the exploration and development of the Sichuan Basin as an example. Acta Petrolei Sinica, Vol. 32(3), p.484. (2011).

Google Scholar

[7] Goktan RM, Yilmaz NG. A new methodology for the analysis of the relationship between rock brittleness index and drag pick cutting. The Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Vol. 105, p.727 (2005).

Google Scholar

[8] Hai jun Yang, Guiting Hou, Zhongyao Xiao, et al. The Assessment Criterion and Application of Structural Fracturesin Tight Sandstone in the Eastern Kuche Basin[J]. Advance in Geosciences Vol. 2, p.117 (2012).

Google Scholar

[9] Zhang P, HOU GT, PAN WQ, et al. Effect of Carbonate Rock to Developmen of Structural Fracture in the Area of Keping, Xinjiang, China. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis Vol. 47, p.831(2011).

Google Scholar

[10] P. Riley, B. tikoff, A. B. Murray. Quantification of fracture networks in non-layered, massscie rock using synthetic and natural data sets. Tectonophysic Vol. 505, p.44(2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2011.04.002

Google Scholar

[11] Mandelbrot B B. Passoja D E, Paullay A J. Nature. P. 308-721. (1984).

Google Scholar

[12] Miller,S. M. et al. Ambiguities in estimating fractal dimensions of rock fracture surfaces, Proc. 31st U.S. Symp. On Rock Mechanics. Balkema Publishers. P. 471 (1990).

DOI: 10.1201/9781003078944-70

Google Scholar

[13] Kenneth J, Falconer K. Fractal geometry-mathematical foundations and applications. Translated by ZENG Wenqu, et al. Shenyang: Northeast University Press, Shenyang (1991).

Google Scholar

[14] Gao P. The application of EXCEL in the multiple linear regression analysis. Qinghai Statistics Vol. 12, p.27 (2006).

Google Scholar