Power Distribution System Evaluation in Chemical Industry Park Using Subjective and Objective Comprehensive Weight Method

Abstract:

The plan for power supply and distribution system in the Chemical Industry Park is complex. The evaluation method must be easy and truly show the site conditions in order to maintain the proper function of the system. Thus the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was chosen and applied in this paper. As for the weight calculation, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to compute the subjective weight; on the purpose of avoiding strong effect of subjective factors, the standard deviation for each index was calculated, and then the subjective weight was integrated to build the subjective and objective comprehensive weight model. Lastly fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was applied into the model for assessing the power supply and distribution system in the Chemical Industry Park.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 986-987)
• Pages: 419-423
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.986-987.419
• Online since: July 2014
• Authors: Zai Peng Duan*, Xin Ming Qian, Ru Jun Wang, Ying Quan Duo
• Keywords: AHP, Chemical Industry Park, Distribution System, Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation, Objective Comprehensive Weight, Power Supply, Standard Deviation, Subjective Weight

References

[1] Fengzhang Luo. Evaluation theory and integrated application for the modern power distribution system [D]. Tianjin University, (2009).

[2] Riehard E Brown. Electric Power Distribution Reliability [M]. New York: Marcel Dekker, (2002).

[3] ZadehL A. Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes [J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1990 37 (3) 222-228.

[4] Zhen Zhang and so on. Research on supplier evaluation based on AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation [J]. Northeastern University Journal, 2006 27 (10) 1142-1145.

[5] Juliang Jin and so on. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based on improved analytic hierarchy process [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004 (3) 65-70.