Study on the Feasibility of SRV in Coal Reservoir

Article Preview

Abstract:

In our country there is plenty of CBM (coalbed methane), but the state of CBM itself, unique output mechanism and low saturation, low permeability, low reservoir pressure and high gas content, et al. determine the low efficiency of it, so in order to improve CBM recovery, combined with the successful experience of north American shale gas reservoir by SRV(stimulated reservoir volume), the writer summarizes the implementation of SRV, deeply analyzes effectiveness and limitations of this new technology in CBM development. The results of practical research and theoretical analysis show that SRV in the coal reservoir can achieve the desired effect on the condition that there are great quantity of natural fractures, joints and bedding, weak structure surface development in the reservoir, the rock brittleness index is greater than 40 and horizontal principal stress difference is relatively smaller. Finally, simulating a well’s condition by the MEYER software, the result shows that SRV is feasible in coal reservoir, which will create important guiding significance and practical value for the exploration of CBM.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 986-987)

Pages:

734-737

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Cipolla C L, Warpinski N R, Mayerhofer M J, et al. The relationship between fracture complexity, reservoir properties, and fracture treatment design[C]. SPE 115769, (2008).

DOI: 10.2118/115769-ms

Google Scholar

[2] ZHANG Yi, XIAN Baoan, SUN Fenjin, WANG Yibing, BAO Qingying. The reasons for low yield of coal-bed methane production and technology of improvement[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30(6): 55-59.

Google Scholar

[3] ZHANG Yapu, YANG Zhengming, XIAN Baoan, et al. The technology of improving coal-bed methane[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2006, 13(1): 95-98.

Google Scholar

[4] LI Anqi, JIANG Hai, CHEN Caihong. In China Coal-bed methane Wells' practice of hydraulic fracturing and seam crack model selection analysis[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2004, 24(5): 91-93.

Google Scholar

[5] Olson J E, Taleghani A D. Modeling simulation growth of multiple hydraulic fractures and their interaction with natural fracture[C]. SPE 119739, (2009).

Google Scholar

[6] Maxwell S C, Urbancic T J, Steinsberger N, et al. Micro seismic imaging of hydraulic fracture complexity in the Barnett shale[C]. SPE 77440, (2002).

DOI: 10.2118/77440-ms

Google Scholar