Heavy Metal by Zero-Valent Iron and Natural Zeolite Partitioning in Acid Mine Drainage: A Comparative Study

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, two different bed materials in media filter systems were examined. Natural zeolite has the ability to take up heavy metals (Cd, Zn) from acid mine drainage (AMD) as well as zero-valent iron (ZVI). The aim of the study was to estimate the ability to remove heavy metals of Natural zeolite and compare the efficiencies of the two media. A major purpose of this report was to determine which media would have a higher permeation rate after running a period of time. It was concluded that ZVI had a higher efficiency of taking up heavy metals (>96.5%) and a faster permeation rate which had a longer operating life.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 986-987)

Pages:

751-754

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Cheng, H., et al., Geochemical processes controlling fate and transport of arsenic in acid mine drainage (AMD) and natural systems. Journal of hazardous materials, 2009. 165(1): pp.13-26.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.070

Google Scholar

[2] Hierro, A., et al., Geochemical behavior of metals and metalloids in an estuary affected by acid mine drainage (AMD). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013: pp.1-17.

DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-2189-5

Google Scholar

[3] Wilkin, R.T., R.W. Puls and G.W. Sewell, Long‐term performance of permeable reactive barriers using zero‐valent iron: Geochemical and microbiological effects. Ground Water, 2003. 41(4): pp.493-503.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2003.tb02383.x

Google Scholar

[4] Henderson, A.D. and A.H. Demond, Long-term performance of zero-valent iron permeable reactive barriers: a critical review. Environmental Engineering Science, 2007. 24(4): pp.401-423.

DOI: 10.1089/ees.2006.0071

Google Scholar

[5] Fu, F., D.D. Dionysiou and H. Liu, The use of zero-valent iron for groundwater remediation and wastewater treatment: A review. Journal of hazardous materials, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.062

Google Scholar

[6] Bigg, T. and S.J. Judd, Zero-valent iron for water treatment. Environmental Technology, 2000. 21(6): pp.661-670.

DOI: 10.1080/09593332108618077

Google Scholar

[7] Zorpas, A.A., et al., Heavy metal uptake by natural zeolite and metals partitioning in sewage sludge compost. Bioresource Technology, 2000. 72(2): pp.113-119.

DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(99)00110-8

Google Scholar

[8] Kesraoui Ouki, S., C.R. Cheeseman and R. Perry, Natural zeolite utilisation in pollution control: A review of applications to metals' effluents. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 1994. 59(2): pp.121-126.

DOI: 10.1002/jctb.280590202

Google Scholar

[9] Okubo, T. and J. Matsumoto, Effect of infiltration rate on biological clogging and water quality changes during artificial recharge. Water Resources Research, 1979. 15(6): pp.1536-1542.

DOI: 10.1029/wr015i006p01536

Google Scholar

[10] Mays, D.C. and J.R. Hunt, Hydrodynamic aspects of particle clogging in porous media. Environmental science & technology, 2005. 39(2): pp.577-584.

DOI: 10.1021/es049367k

Google Scholar

[11] Sani, A., et al., Impact of Water Quality Parameters on the Clogging of Vertical-Flow Constructed Wetlands Treating Urban Wastewater. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2013. 224(3): pp.1-18.

DOI: 10.1007/s11270-013-1488-2

Google Scholar

[12] Rinck-Pfeiffer, S., et al., Interrelationships between biological, chemical, and physical processes as an analog to clogging in aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) wells. Water Research, 2000. 34(7): pp.2110-2118.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(99)00356-5

Google Scholar