The Influence of Perceptual Load on Inhibition of Return

Xing Juan Liu; Zhi Hao Fan; Jian Zhong Zhou

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.989-994.1093

Paper Titles

Study on Degradation of Traditional Chinese Medicine Wastewater with Cu/Cu₂O Composite Photocatalyst
p.1073

Design Consideration of a Health-Information-Technology-Supported Intelligent Urinalysis System
p.1077

An Improved Medical Image Fusion Method Based on Nonsubsampled Contourlet Transform
p.1082

Interactive Medical Image Segmentation Method with only Positive Label Examples
p.1088

The Influence of Perceptual Load on Inhibition of Return
p.1093

The Design and Application of the Information Management Platform for the Prevention and Control of AIDS on the Basis of the Residents' Health Records
p.1097

Mobile Nurse Information System with Efficient Physiological Monitoring for Patient
p.1103

College Female Students’ Physical Health Evaluation Index Correlation Research Based on the PDCA Cycle Model
p.1107

The Risk Factors for Pediatric Care and Preventive Measures
p.1111

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 989-994The Influence of Perceptual Load on Inhibition of...

The Influence of Perceptual Load on Inhibition of Return

Abstract:

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to a slower response to a target which appears at a previously attended location. We investigated whether perceptual load effects onset time of IOR in detection tasks. The results showed that the onset time of IOR was complex in different level of perceptual load. IOR effect was significant when perceptual load was low at 350ms, but the facilitation effect was significant at 850ms and 1350ms when perceptual load was high. The results indicated the onset time of IOR was influenced by perceptual load, indicating that perceptual load hinder the spatiotemporal correspondence between the cue and target integration.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 989-994)

Pages:

1093-1096

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.989-994.1093

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2014

Authors:

Xing Juan Liu*, Zhi Hao Fan, Jian Zhong Zhou

Keywords:

Flanker Interference, Inhibition of Return (IOR), Perceptual Load

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Lavie, N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1995, 21(3), 451-468.

DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.451

Google Scholar

[2] Lavie, N., Hirst, A., Fockert, J. W. et al. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive contro[J]l. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2004, 133(3), 339-354.

DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.339

Google Scholar

[3] Wei P, & Zhou X, L. The Perceptual Load Theory and Selective Attention[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2005, 13（4）：413-420.

Google Scholar

[4] Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. Components of visual orienting. In H Bouma, D Bouwhuis (Eds. ). Attention and performance X. Erlbaum Associates . Ltd, 1984, 1531–556.

Google Scholar

[5] Liu, X.J., Zhang, M., Zhou, J.Z. Distractors Processing Modulate the Onset of Inhibition of Return in Discrimination tasks. ICME International Confenence on Complex Medial Engineering , (2013).

DOI: 10.1109/iccme.2013.6548313

Google Scholar

[6] Lupiáñez, J., Milliken, B., Solano, C., Weaver, B., Tipper, S. P. (2001). On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A(3), 753-773.

DOI: 10.1080/713755990

Google Scholar

[7] Liu, X.J., Tang, X., Zhou, J.Z. The Influence of Flanker Interference on Inhibition of Return. IEEE. International Confenence on Mechatronics and Automation, (2013).

DOI: 10.1109/icma.2013.6618181

Google Scholar

[8] Liu, X.J., Zhang,Y., Wang, H.Y., Zhang, M. Three Factors Theory of the Time Course of Inhibition of Return and Its Development[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2014, 37（01）, 31-36.

Google Scholar