Comparison and Characterization of Two Preparation Methods of Graphene Oxide

Hong Bo Liu; Wu Ying Zhang; Feng Lin; Hong Da Cao

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.989-994.125

Paper Titles

Preparation and In Vitro Release Behaviors of Paclitaxel-Loaded Pluronic F87/Poly(Lactic Acid) Nanoparticle
p.102

Application of High-Efficiency Reverse Osmosis Technology in Reclaimed Water Treatment in Power Plants
p.108

Measurement of Ultra Low Sulfur in IN718 by Using Infrared Absorption Method
p.115

The Synthesis and Characterization of Polyphenylene Vinylene (PPV) Derivatives with Alkoxy Branched Chains
p.121

Comparison and Characterization of Two Preparation Methods of Graphene Oxide
p.125

Detection of Phase Purity of Sr₂FeMoO₆by Raman Spectroscopy
p.130

A Novel Environment Friendly Material: Sucrose Char Sulfonic Acid Catalyzed Three-Component Mannich Reaction
p.134

Investigation of Sewage Sludge Anaerobic Digestion Performance Using Peracetic Acid as a Pretreatment
p.138

Synthesis and Characterization of Sulfonated Poly(Arylene Ether Sulfone) Multiblock Copolymers for Proton Exchange Membrane
p.142

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 989-994Comparison and Characterization of Two Preparation...

Comparison and Characterization of Two Preparation Methods of Graphene Oxide

Abstract:

The graphene oxides were prepared form graphite by thermal expansion and ultrasonic dispersion. The structure of graphene oxides was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR), scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectra. The difference of structure of graphene oxides by two preparation methods was compared. The measurement of FTIR and XRD showed the graphite was completely oxidized. The graphene oxide prepared by thermal expansion would lose large number of active functional groups, such as hydroxyl, carboxyl group, et al. However, the graphene oxide prepared by ultrasonic dispersion can retain these active functional groups. These active functional groups will be benefit to chemically modify the graphene oxides and prepare the polymer/graphene nanocomposites.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 989-994)

Pages:

125-129

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.989-994.125

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2014

Authors:

Hong Bo Liu*, Wu Ying Zhang, Feng Lin, Hong Da Cao

Keywords:

Characterization, Graphene Oxide, Method, Preparation

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] K. P. Loh, Q. L. Bao, P. K. Ang, et al: J. Mater. Chem. Vol. 20 (2010), p.2277.

Google Scholar

[2] V. Nalla, L. Polavarapu, K. K. Manga: Nanotechnol. Vol. 21 (2010), p.415203.

Google Scholar

[3] K.P. Pramoda, H. Hussain, H.M. Koh, et al: J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. Vol. 48 (2010), p.4262.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Kuilla, S. Bhadra, D. Yao, et al : Prog. Polym. Sci., Vol. 35 (2010), p.1350.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Ansari, E.P. Giannelis: J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. Vol. 47 (2009), p.888.

Google Scholar

[6] T. Ramanathan, A.A. Abdala, S. Stankovich, et al: Nat. Nanotechnol. Vol. 3 (2008), p.327.

Google Scholar

[7] Y.R. Lee, A.V. Raghu, H.M. Jeong, et al: Macromol. Chem. Phys. Vol. 210 (2009), p.1247.

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Xu, Y. Wang, L. Jiajie, et al: Nano. Res. Vol. 2 (2009), p.343.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Becerril, J. Mao, Z. Liu, et al: ACS Nano. Vol. 2 (2008), p.463.

Google Scholar

[10] A.K. Dikin, S. Stankovich, E.J. Zimney, et al: Nature. Vol. 448 (2008), p.457.

Google Scholar

[11] L. Vickery, A.J. Patil, S. Mann: Adv. Mater. Vol. 21 (2009), p.2180.

Google Scholar

[12] M.J. McAllister, J.L. Li, D.H. Adamson, et al: Chem. Mater. Vol. 19 (2009), p.4396.

Google Scholar

[13] S. Stankovich, D.A. Dikin, G.H.B. Dommett, et al: Nature. Vol. 442 (2006), p.282.

Google Scholar