Paper Titles
Application and Debugging of All-Digital Frequency Synthesizer
p.4058
Electronic Satellite Scheduling Problem and its Heuristic Method
p.4062
Recent Improvements in Image Retrieval
p.4069
Mineral Belt Image Segmentation Using Firefly Algorithm
p.4074
The Hidden Terminal Problem of 802.11 MAC and 802.15.4 MAC Protocols Based on NS2 Platform
p.4078
Research on Halftone Technique of Digital Images
p.4082
Research and Implement of Digital Image Watermark Based on DCT
p.4086
Face Recognition Based on Gabor Filter and Improved Linear Local Tangent Space Alignment Algorithm
p.4091
A New Way to Optimize LDPC Code in Multiple Access Channel
p.4095

The Hidden Terminal Problem of 802.11 MAC and 802.15.4 MAC Protocols Based on NS2 Platform

Article Preview

Abstract:

The IEEE 802.11 and IEEE 802.15.4 are two of the most popular wireless network protocols. And it is very important to look into the differences between IEEE 802.11 MAC and IEEE 802.15.4 MAC. The main goal of this paper is to look into the hidden terminal problem of the MAC layers of 802.11 and 802.15.4 based on NS2 platform. Through a dedicated experiment, the author compares the results based on the NAM animation and throughput and then explains the reasons respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Materials Science, Computer and Information Technology View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 989-994)

Pages:

4078-4081

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.989-994.4078

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2014

Authors:

Dong Qiu*, Yan Xiang Yang

Keywords:

Hidden Terminal, IEEE 802.11 MAC, IEEE 802.15.4 MAC, RTS/CTS

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] IEEE P802. 15. 4/D18, Draft Standard: Low Rate Wireless Personal area networks, Feb. (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] IEEE 802. 11, Part 11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications, IEEE, Aug. (1999).

DOI: 10.1109/ieeestd.1997.85951

Google Scholar

[3] Gang Lu Bhaskar Krishnamachari, and Cauligi S. Raghavendra, Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802. 15. 4 MAC for Low-Rate Low-Power Wireless Network, Performance, Computing, and Communications, 2004, pp.701-706.

DOI: 10.1109/pccc.2004.1301180

Google Scholar

[4] Hongqiang Zhai1, Younggoo Kwon, and Yuguang Fang, Performance analysis of IEEE 802. 11 MAC protocols in wireless LANs, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, Volume 4, Issue 8, December 2004, p.917–931.

DOI: 10.1002/wcm.263

Google Scholar

[5] S. Pollin, M. Ergen, M. Timmers, L. VanDer Perre, F. Catthoor, I. Moerman, and A. Bahai, Distributed cognitive coexistence of 802. 15. 4 with 802. 11, in Proc. CrownCom, 2006, p.1–5.

DOI: 10.1109/crowncom.2006.363456

Google Scholar

[6] Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications for low-rate wireless personal area networks (LRWPANs), IEEE Std. 802. 15. 4 Std., (2003).

DOI: 10.1109/ieeestd.2006.232110

Google Scholar

[7] X. Ling, Y. Cheng, J. W. Mark, and X. Shen, A renewal theory based analytical model for the contention access period of ieee 802. 15. 4 mac, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 7, no. 6, 2008, p.2340–2349.

DOI: 10.1109/twc.2008.070048

Google Scholar

[8] Jim T. Geier, Wireless LANs: Implementing Interoperable Networks, New Riders Publishing, Thousand Oaks, CA, (1998).

Google Scholar