Distribution Center Multi-Objective Location Problem Using NSGA-II

Article Preview

Abstract:

Considering two goals of market share and location cost, this article builds a bi-objective location model. NSGA-II is utilized to acquire a Pareto non-dominated solution set. According to actual conditions such as cost constraints, decision-makers can choose solutions from non-dominated solution set. Furthermore, an approach based on Technique for Ordering Preferences by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and minimum system’s cost under set covering are used to find out two reasonable solutions from the non-dominated solution set for decision-makers.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 998-999)

Pages:

1133-1137

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Berman O, Krass D: Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 29 (2002) No. 6, pp.563-581.

Google Scholar

[2] Karasakal O, Karasakal E K: Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 31 (2004) No. 9, pp.1515-1526.

DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0548(03)00105-9

Google Scholar

[3] Huff D L: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 28 (1964) No. 3, pp.34-38.

Google Scholar

[4] Deb K: Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms(John Wiley & Sons, U. K 2001), p.315.

Google Scholar

[5] Deb K, Sundar J, Udaya Bhaskara Rao N and Chaudhuri S: International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, Vol. 2 (2006) No. 3, pp.273-286.

Google Scholar

[6] M.G. Gong, L.C. Jiao and D.D. Yang: Journal of Software, Vol. 20 (2009) No. 2, pp.271-289.

Google Scholar

[7] Srinivas N, Deb K: Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 2 (1994) No. 3, pp.221-248.

Google Scholar

[8] Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S and Meyarivan T A M T: Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 6 (2002) No. 2, pp.182-197.

Google Scholar

[9] Villegas J G, Palacios F and Medaglia A L: Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 147 (2006) No. 1, pp.109-141.

Google Scholar

[10] Doerner K F, Gutjahr W J and Nolz P C: OR Spectrum, Vol. 31 (2009) No. 3, pp.651-678.

Google Scholar

[11] Bhattacharya R, Bandyopadhyay S: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 51 (2010) No. 1-4, pp.397-414.

Google Scholar

[12] Rahmati S H A, Hajipour V and Niaki S T A: Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 13 (2013) No. 4, pp.1728-1740.

Google Scholar

[13] Hwang C-L, Yoon K and Beckmann M: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey (Springer, U. K 1981), p.55.

Google Scholar

[14] X.B. Li: Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 79 (2009) No. 5, pp.789-795.

Google Scholar

[15] Ramesh S, Kannan S and Baskar S: Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 12 (2012) No. 2, pp.741-753.

Google Scholar