Effect of Control Parameters of Secondary Jet on Fluidic Thrust Vectoring

Article Preview

Abstract:

The flow field was simulated in a 2D convergent-divergent nozzle, for fluidic thrust vectoring with N-S method. Based on the specific design, the effects of control parameters of secondary jet injection is investigated, and a method is proposed to calculate the initial state of secondary jet, which is different from original hypothesis of stagnation. The results showed that the two methods have closed results and the stagnation hypothesis is suitable for the calculation of the initial state of secondary jet.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 998-999)

Pages:

613-616

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] E. Gamble, D. Haid, Improving Off-Design Nozzle Performance Using Fluidic Injection, AIAA-2004-1206.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-1206

Google Scholar

[2] K. A. Deere, Computational Investigation of the Aerodynamic Effects on Fluidic Thrust Vectoring, 36th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, (2000).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2000-3598

Google Scholar

[3] Eleuterio F. Toro, Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid dynamics (2nd Edition), Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, (1999).

Google Scholar

[4] K. A. Waithe and K. A. Deere, Experimental and Computational Investigation of Multiple Injection Ports in a Convergent-divergent Nozzle for Fluidic Thrust Vectoring, AIAA-2003-3802.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-3802

Google Scholar

[5] Mark S. Mason, William J. Crowther, Fluidic Thrust Vectoring of Low Observable Aircraft, CEAS Aerospace Aerodynamic Research Conference, (2002).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-2210

Google Scholar

[6] Li Li, Tsutomu Saito, A Survery of Performance of Fluidic Thrust Vectoring Mechanisms by Numerical and Experimental Studies, International Journal of Aerospace Innovations, 5(3-4), pp.51-60, (2013).

DOI: 10.1260/1757-2258.5.3-4.51

Google Scholar