Landfill Gas Resource Assessment - An Adaptation from Oil and Gas Exploration Technique

Abstract:

Landfill Gas (LFG) composed of approximately 50% methane and 50% carbon dioxide is known as one of the Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) that could pollute the environment and contribute to the global warming. In the conventional approach, volume of methane is approximated from its emission using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2006 First-order Decay (FOD) model. This model has been formalized as a USEPA landfill gas emission model (LandGEM) in 2005 and IPCC Waste Model in 2006. LandGEM is a Microsoft Excel based software application that uses a first-order decay rate equation to calculate methane and LFG generation. It is the most widely used LFG model and is the industry standard. However, the software requires a number of parameters estimates such as organic content, disposal data and rates, site closure dates, expansion schedules or collection efficiencies and knowledge of waste composition. Inaccuracies in the estimates can result in large errors in predicting future recovery, which could affect the production system. This research evaluate the potential of deploying the volumetric estimation technique in oil and gas exploration to locate methane accumulation location and estimate the volume prior to its emission to the atmosphere on the Air Hitam Landfill as the case study. The gross rock volume is an approximation of the total area covered by the landfill, while porosity and water saturation are simulated estimations. The result gives an approximation of 1.65 billion standard cubic feet (BSCF) of LFG in-place that could generate 25,948 tonnes of methane worth RM6 to RM8 millions of carbon credit and RM55 millions of revenues from electricity sale.

• Periodical: Advances in Science and Technology (Volume 123)
• Pages: 77-85
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-63x8p0
• Online since: February 2023
• Authors: Wan Zairani Wan Bakar*, Nur Shuhadah Japperi, Zulhelmi Amir, Arina Sauki, Mohd Fazril Irfan Ahmad Fuad
• Keywords: Biogas, Landfill Gas, Renewable Energy, Volumetric Estimation

References

[1] Solomon S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller. IPCC Climate Changes 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, United Kingdom (2007) 996 pp.

[2] Abushammala, M.F.M., Basri, N.E.A., Kadhum, A.A.H., Basri, H., El-Shafie, A.H. and Mastura, S.S.. Evaluation of methane generation rate and potential from selected landfills in Malaysia. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 11(2), (2014) pp.377-384.

DOI: 10.1007/s13762-013-0197-0

[3] Johari, Anwar, Saeed Isa Ahmed, Haslenda Hashim, Habib Alkali, and Mat Ramli. Economic and environmental benefits of landfill gas from municipal solid waste in Malaysia., Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16, no. 5 (2012): 2907-2912.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.005

[4] Japperi, Nur Shuhadah, et al. Review on landfill gas formation from leachate biodegradation. Malaysian Journal of Chemical Engineering and Technology (MJCET) 4.1 (2021) 39-49.

DOI: 10.24191/mjcet.v4i1.12719

[5] Malaysia National Greenhouse Gas Inventory, (2011).

[6] Shabdin, Nurul Hidayah, et al. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trend in Old Landfill, Malaysia. Chemical Engineering Transactions 72 (2019)211-216.

[7] Abushammala, M.F., Basri, N.E.A., Basri, H., El-Shafie, A.H. and Kadhum, A.A.H. Regional landfills methane emission inventory in Malaysia. Waste Management & Research, 29(8), (2011) pp.863-873.

DOI: 10.1177/0734242x10382064

[8] Izzah, N.; Aziz, H.A.; Hana, M.M.; Gheewala, S.H. Biomass and Bioenergy A review on life cycle assessment of biogas production: Challenges and future perspectives in Malaysia. Biomass Bioenergy, 122, (2019) 361–374. 50.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.047

[9] Pillai, J. and Riverol, C. Estimation of gas emission and derived electrical power generation from landfills. Trinidad and Tobago as study case. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 29, (2018) pp.139-146.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2018.08.004

[10] Shin, H.C., Park, J.W., Kim, H.S. and Shin, E.S. Environmental and economic assessment of landfill gas electricity generation in Korea using LEAP model. Energy policy, 33(10), (2005) pp.1261-1270.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.002

[11] Ahmad, Salsabila, Mohd Zainal Abidin Ab Kadir, and Suhaidi Shafie. Current perspective of the renewable energy development in Malaysia. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews 15.2 (2011) 897-904.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.009

[12] Abdullah, Wan Syakirah Wan, et al. The potential and status of renewable energy development in Malaysia. Energies 12.12 (2019) 24-37.

[13] Arij, Y., Fatihah, S. and Rakmi, A.R. Performance of pilot scale anaerobic biofilm digester (ABD) for the treatment of leachate from a municipal waste transfer station. Bioresource Technology, 260, (2018) pp.213-220.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.131

[14] Kumar, Ashutosh, and M. P. Sharma. Estimation of GHG emission and energy recovery potential from MSW landfill sites., Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 5 (2014): 50-61.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2013.11.004

[15] Cargill, S. M.. Meyer. R; F., Picklyk. D. D., and Urquidi, F. Summary of resource assessment methods resulting from the International Geological Correlation Programme Project 98: Math. Geology. v. 9. no, 3~ 0 (1977) 211-220.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02272383

[16] Xia, J. et al. Comparing shear-wave velocity profiles inverted from multichannel surface wave with borehole measurements. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(3), (2002) p.181–190.

DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(02)00008-8

[17] Mahalinga-Iyer, U. and Williams, D.J. Engineering properties of a lateritic soil profile. Engineering Geology, 31(1), (1991) pp.45-58.

DOI: 10.1016/0013-7952(91)90056-q

[18] Yip CH, Chua KH. An overview on the feasibility of harvesting landfill gas from MSW to recover energy. ICCBT;(F(28)) (2008) 303–10.