Thermal Mechanical Performance Mapping of Insulation Material under Extreme Desert Conditions: A Modeling-Based Comparative Study

Article Preview

Abstract:

Lightweight modular buildings deployed in desert environments operate under severe climatic stress, facing extreme daytime temperatures, large diurnal swings and intense solar radiation. These conditions drive continuous heat ingress into the interior and impose thermal fatigue on the building envelope. While insulation materials are typically selected based on steady-state thermal conductivity values, these metrics do not capture transient heat penetration, thermal lag or the mechanical response induced by cyclic temperature loads. This work presents a thermal–mechanical performance-mapping framework that evaluates insulation materials under realistic desert boundary conditions. A multilayer cabin wall is modeled using measured Kuwait summer temperature cycles and solar-equivalent heat flux. Transient one-dimensional heat-transfer analysis is combined with thermo-elastic stress estimation to evaluate polyurethane foam, polyisocyanurate, expanded polystyrene and mineral wool. Dynamic indicators—including interior temperature moderation, thermal lag and normalized daily heat gain—are used to compare performance. The findings reveal substantial discrepancies between laboratory-rated and climate-specific behavior and highlight the need for integrated evaluation when selecting insulation for buildings in extreme climates.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

69-75

Citation:

Online since:

June 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.A. Duffie and W.A. Beckman, Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, 4th ed., Wiley, New York (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] ASHRAE, ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals, ASHRAE, Atlanta (2021).

Google Scholar

[3] L.F. Cabeza, "Dynamic thermal behavior of insulation materials in building envelopes," Renewable Energy 115 (2018) 1251–1260.

Google Scholar

[4] N. Mendes, P.C. Philippi and R. Lamberts, Building Thermal Performance Simulation and Analysis, Taylor & Francis, London (2017).

Google Scholar

[5] D. Zhou and R. Haghighat, "Thermal stress development in multilayer building envelopes under dynamic temperature loading," Journal of Building Physics 43 (2020) 319–341.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Omer, "Performance implications of thermal loads in desert buildings: A review," Construction and Building Materials 230 (2020) 116–125.

Google Scholar

[7] A. Al-Sanea, M.F. Zedan and S. Al-Majed, "Effect of insulation type and position on optimum insulation thickness in hot climates," Applied Energy 88 (2011) 389–399.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Santamouris, "Cooling the buildings – past, present and future," Energy and Buildings 128 (2016) 617–638.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.07.034

Google Scholar

[9] A. Amein and M. Al-Homoud, "Thermal performance of building walls under cyclic boundary conditions," Energy and Buildings 32 (2000) 291–299.

Google Scholar

[10] S. Alwetaishi, "Impact of desert climate on building energy performance," Sustainable Cities and Society 34 (2017) 16–25.

Google Scholar

[11] T. Kubilay, A. Derome and J. Carmeliet, "Transient heat and moisture transport in multilayer building components," Building and Environment 123 (2017) 661–675.

Google Scholar

[12] F. Ascione, N. Bianco, R.F. De Masi and G. Vanoli, "Dynamic simulation of building insulation performance under Mediterranean climate," Energy Procedia 82 (2015) 512–519.

Google Scholar

[13] H. Janssen and S. Roels, "Influence of material properties on mechanical stress in insulation layers subjected to thermal cycling," Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 29 (2017) 04016242.

Google Scholar

[14] Kuwait Meteorological Department, Climatological Data Annual Summary, Kuwait City (2022).

Google Scholar

[15] H. Chung and R. Park, "Thermo-mechanical fatigue in multilayer foam insulation systems," Materials & Design 95 (2016) 50–60.

Google Scholar