Effect of Citric Acid Treatment on Doxycycline Sorption of Chitosan Hydrogel

Article Preview

Abstract:

The development of chitosan hydrogels for open wound treatment shows promise due to their antibacterial properties, moisture retention, antibiotic loading and release capabilities, and potential for cross-linking modifications. This study investigates the effect of citric acid cross-linking on the sorption behavior of doxycycline in pH-gelated chitosan hydrogels by modeling sorption isotherms and evaluating antibacterial activity through measurements of zones of inhibition. Chitosan hydrogels were prepared via pH-induced gelation using 1.0 % v/v acetic acid and 2.5 M sodium hydroxide. Citric acid cross-linking was facilitated by adding citric acid at concentrations of 0%, 1%, 3%, and 6% (w/v). Results showed that the Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm best described the sorption for 0%, 3%, and 6% citric acid gels, attributed to microporous structures and energy heterogeneity of the adsorption sites, while the Toth isotherm fit the 1% gel. Citric acid concentration did not significantly affect the antibacterial efficacy of the hydrogels, suggesting that cross-linking can improve mechanical properties without negating the antibacterial activity of doxycycline.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

31-36

Citation:

Online since:

July 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K. Las Heras, M. Igartua, E. Santos-Vizcaino and R.M. Hernandez: J. Control. Release Vol. 328 (2020), pp.532-550.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.09.039

Google Scholar

[2] S. Suryati, R. Mulyawan, S. Sulhatun and M.T. Muhammad: Int. J. Eng. Sci. Inf. Technol. Vol. 3 (2023).

Google Scholar

[3] H. Malhotra and R.K. Gautam, in: Biomedical Applications of Chitosan and Its Derivatives (Wiley, 2024), Ch. 4.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Sharkawy, M.F. Barreiro and A.E. Rodrigues: Carbohydr. Polym. Vol. 248 (2020), p.116885.

Google Scholar

[5] O.P. Murphy, M. Vashishtha, P. Palanisamy and V.K. Kannuchamy: ACS Omega Vol. 8 (2023), pp.17407-17430.

Google Scholar

[6] T. Furuike, D. Komoto, H. Hashimoto and H. Tamura: Int. J. Biol. Macromol. Vol. 104 (2017), pp.1620-1625.

Google Scholar

[7] N. Sharmin, J.T. Rosnes, L. Prabhu, U. Böcker and M. Sivertsvik: Molecules Vol. 27 (2022), p.5118.

DOI: 10.3390/molecules27165118

Google Scholar

[8] R.H. Moghaddam, S. Dadfarnia, A. Mohammad, R. Amraei and Z.H. Moghaddam: Int. J. Biol. Macromol. Vol. 154 (2020), pp.962-973.

Google Scholar

[9] E.R. Sanders: J. Vis. Exp. Vol. 63 (2012).

Google Scholar

[10] H.N. Tran: J. Tech. Ed. Sci. Vol. 70B (2022), pp.33-47.

Google Scholar

[11] N.J. Barrow: Eur. J. Soil Sci. Vol. 74 (2023).

Google Scholar

[12] N. Sedyakina, A. Kuskov, K. Velonia, N. Feldman, S. Lutsenko and G. Avramenko: Materials Vol. 13 (2020), p.1989.

Google Scholar

[13] W.K. Abdulsahib, S.H. Ganduh, M.A. Mahdi and L.S. Jasim: Int. J. Appl. Pharm. Vol. 12 (2020), pp.100-106.

Google Scholar