Point-Contact Spectroscopy in Doped and Irradiated MgB2

Article Preview

Abstract:

We review recent results of point-contact spectroscopy (PCS) in doped (with Al, C or Mn) and neutron-irradiated samples of the two-band superconductor MgB2. The aim of these measurements was to clarify the role of inter- and intra-band scattering, and to test the theoretical expectations about the effects of substitutions and disorder on two-band superconductivity. The gap amplitudes, Δπ and Δσ, were obtained as a function of the critical temperature of the junctions (or of the doping content) by fitting the conductance curves with the two-band BTK model. The analysis of the resulting curves within the Eliashberg theory allowed us to extract information on the partial DOSs, as well as on the scattering rates within and between the two bands. The results are discussed and compared to theoretical expectations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

75-81

Citation:

Online since:

October 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.R. Cava, H.W. Zandbergen and K. Inumaru, Physica C 385, 8 (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] J. Karpinski et al., Phys. Rev. B 71, 174506 (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] S. M. Kazakov et al., Phys. Rev. B 71, 024533 (2005).

Google Scholar

[4] A.Y. Liu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 087005 (2001).

Google Scholar

[5] R.S. Gonnelli et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 247004 (2002).

Google Scholar

[6] Yu V. Sharvin, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 48, 984 (1965).

Google Scholar

[7] S.C. Erwin and I.I. Mazin, Phys. Rev. B 68, 132505 (2003).

Google Scholar

[8] H.J. Choi et al., Nature 418, 758 (2002).

Google Scholar

[9] R.S. Gonnelli et al., Phys. Rev. B 69, 100504(R), (2004).

Google Scholar

[10] M. Putti et al., Phys. Rev. B 71, 144505 (2005).

Google Scholar

[11] G. Profeta et al., Phys. Rev. B 68, 144508 (2003).

Google Scholar

[12] J. Kortus et al., PRL 94, 027002 (2005).

Google Scholar

[13] B. Renker et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 067001 (2002).

Google Scholar

[14] R.S. Gonnelli et al., Phys. Rev. B 71, 060503(R) (2005).

Google Scholar

[15] Z. Holanová et al., Phys. Rev. B 70, 064520 (2004).

Google Scholar

[16] G.A. Ummarino, D. Daghero, R.S. Gonnelli, A. H. Moudden, Phys. Rev. B 71, 134511 (2005).

Google Scholar

[17] K. Rogacki et al., cond-mat/0510227.

Google Scholar

[18] R.S. Gonnelli et al., cond-mat/0510329 (submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. ).

Google Scholar

[19] M. Putti et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 077003 (2006).

Google Scholar

[20] D. Daghero et al., in preparation.

Google Scholar

[21] C. Camerlingo et al., Phys. Rev. B 31, 3121 (1985); K. Tanabe et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 559 (1984).

Google Scholar

[22] A.P. Geraschenko et al., Phys. Rev. B 65, 132506 (2002).

Google Scholar