Risk Analysis of Delay in Construction Project Based on Design and Build Contract

Article Preview

Abstract:

The selection of a procurement system through Design-Build is one of the alternatives for reducing the project implementation schedule, but time delays still occur. This study aims to determine the priority of risk sources and risk control strategies using the house of risk method through a questionnaire given to experts as respondents. Forty risk events and 17 risk agents will be assigned to contractors experienced in design-build construction on building projects. Based on the analysis results, the highest risk priority was that the contract between the project owner and the design-build contractor was unclear or contained ambiguities. The highest risk management strategy priority is on Strong and continuous communication and collaboration among all parties involved, including project owners, designers, contractors, and subcontractors, while the lowest risk control strategy is negotiation and agreement when facing unclear or inaccurate information, involving the owner in an open and constructive negotiation process. The findings will provide deeper insight into the effectiveness of risk control strategies for contractors and owners. not only that, the results of this study can be used as material in making improvements to the Design-Build method in minimising the potential for construction project delays.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

45-54

Citation:

Online since:

March 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Kuriansyah M Y, Juliastuti, and Suhendra, A, (2023), Risk identification for design and build breakwater project using risk breakdown structure (case study: Sanur project, Bali, Indonesia), AIP Conference Proceedings.

DOI: 10.1063/5.0112062

Google Scholar

[2] Firdaus. A., and Amrina. U, (2023), Analyzing the gap in supply chain business process of national engineering procurement construction (EPC) company using rapid assessment procedure, AIP Conference Proceedings.

DOI: 10.1063/5.0105473

Google Scholar

[3] Erdogan S A, Saparauskas J, and Turskis Z, (2017), Decision making in construction management: AHP and expert choice approach, Procedia Engineering, Vol 172 pp.270-276

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.111

Google Scholar

[4] Tucker S N, Mohamed S, Johnston D R, McFallan S L, and Hampson K D, (2001), Building and Construction Industries supply Chain Project (Domestic) Report for Department of Industry, Science and Resources.

Google Scholar

[5] Konchar. M and Sanvido. V, (1998), Comparison of U.S. Project Delivery Systems, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol 124 No 6 p.435–444.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1998)124:6(435)

Google Scholar

[6] Jalal M P, Nikkhou S, and Hoseingholi M, (2020) Challenges of the Engineering Design Partnership Group in Design-Build Contracts, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, Vol 12 Issue 3.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000416

Google Scholar

[7] Asmar M. E., Hanna A. S., and Loh. W, (2013), Quantifying Performance for the Integrated Project Delivery System as Compared to Established Delivery Systems, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol 139 Issue 3.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000744

Google Scholar

[8] Khairulzan.Y and Nabilah A. H. S., (2015), The significant factors causing delay of building construction projects in Malaysia, Malaysia Construction Journal, Vol 20 p.593–599.

Google Scholar

[9] Chan A P C, Ho D C K, Tam C M 2001 Design and build project success factors: multivariate analysis Journal of Construction Engineering and Management Vol 127 Issue 2 p.151–168

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2001)127:2(93)

Google Scholar

[10] Xia B, Chen Q, Xu Y, Li M, and Jin. X., (2014), Design-build contractor selection for public sustainable buildings, Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol 31 Issue 5

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000295

Google Scholar

[11] Heravi A, Coffey V, and Trigunarsyah B, (2015), Evaluating the level of stakeholder involvement during the project planning processes of building projects, International Journal of Project Management, Vol 33 Issue 5 p.985–997.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.12.007

Google Scholar

[12] Gransberg D. D and Molenaar K. R., (2019), Critical comparison of progressive design-build and construction manager/general contractor project delivery methods, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol 2673 Issue 1 p.261–268.

DOI: 10.1177/0361198118822315

Google Scholar

[13] Kasmita K. J., (2018), Design-Build Theory Yogyakarta: Islamic University Of Indonesia

Google Scholar

[14] Toni. A., (2011), Identification of risks at PT.XYZ affects time performance In Indonesia , Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Google Scholar

[15] Migliaccio G C, Bogus S M, and Chen .A., (2011), Effect of Duration of Design–Build Procurement on Performance of Transportation Projects, Transportation Research Record, Vol 2151 Issue 1 p.67–73.

DOI: 10.3141/2151-09

Google Scholar

[16] Shrestha P P, Migliaccio G C O, O'Connor J T, and Gibson G E, (2007), Benchmarking of Large Design–Build Highway Projects: One-to-One Comparison and Comparison with Design–Bid–Build Projects, Transportation Research Record ,Vol 1994 Issue 1 p.17–25.

DOI: 10.3141/1994-03

Google Scholar

[17] Pujawan I N, (2005), Supply Chain Management Surabaya: Guna Widya

Google Scholar

[18] Modupe A O, Emmanuel O O, Agnes S O, and Ayodele M. B., (2012), Impact of Risk on Performance of Design and Build Projects in Lagos State, Nigeria Journal of civil engineering and architecture, Vol 6 No. 9 pp.1210-1217.

DOI: 10.17265/1934-7359/2012.09.013

Google Scholar

[19] Project Management Institute (2003) The Construction Extension to the PMBOK PA: Project Management Institute.

Google Scholar

[20] Pujawan. I. N, and Geraldin L. H., (2009) House of risk: A model for Proactive Supply Chain Risk Management, Business Process Management Journal, Vol 15 Issue 6 p.953 – 967.

DOI: 10.1108/14637150911003801

Google Scholar

[21] Park. J and Kwak. Y. H., (2017), Design-bid-build (DBB) vs. design-build (DB) in the US public transportation projects: the choice and consequences, International Journal of Project Management, Vol 35 Issue 3 p.280–295.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.013

Google Scholar

[22] Liu J, Xie Q, Xia B, and Bridge A J 2017 Impact of Design Risk on the Performance of Design-Build Projects Journal of Construction Engineering and Management Vol 143 No 6.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001299

Google Scholar

[23] Kalach A V, Akulov A Y, and Cherepanov E. A., (2020 ), Integrated Fire Risk Factors Analysis in the Residential Districts of Russian Federation Regions, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol 459 Chapter 3.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/459/4/042045

Google Scholar

[24] Shen Y, Xu M, Lin Y, Cui C, Shi X, and Liu. Y., (2022), Safety Risk Management of Prefabricated Building Construction Based on Ontology Technology in the BIM Environment, Buildings, Vol 12 Issue 6.

DOI: 10.3390/buildings12060765

Google Scholar

[25] Aslam M, Baffoe-Twum E, and Saleem. F., (2019), Design Changes in Construction Projects – Causes and Impact on the Cost, Civil Engineering Journal, Vol 5 No 7 pp.1647-1655

DOI: 10.28991/cej-2019-03091360

Google Scholar

[26] Nguyen P. T. and Nguyen. P., (2020), Risk Management in Engineering and Construction A Case Study in Design-Build Projects in Vietnam Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, Vol 10 Issue 1 pp.5237-5241.

DOI: 10.48084/etasr.3286

Google Scholar

[27] Rostiyanti S, Koesalamwardi A B, and Winata. C., (2019), Identification of design-build project risk factors: contractor's perspective, MATEC Web ConferenceI, Vol 276.

DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201927602017

Google Scholar

[28] Yuristanti T, Wiguna I P A, and Budianto. H., (2020), Analysis of Project Performance Criteria for Design and Build Contract, Journal of Infrastructure & Asset Management, Vol 2 No 2.

DOI: 10.12962/jifam.v2i2.6945

Google Scholar