Post-Earthquake Realignment and Repairs: A Novel Application for Structural Control and Health Monitoring

Article Preview

Abstract:

Structural health monitoring and control (SHMC) for Post-earthquake realignment and repairs (PERR) is one of the most challenging issues facing earthquake engineers worldwide. Currently, neither SHMC nor PERR are parts of contemporary curricula and codes of practice. The ultimate aim of SHMC is to help achieve a viable degree of structural sustainability (SS) under predictable environmental conditions. In the present context SHMC refers to the effort that aims at achieving structural operability before and after severe earthquakes. SHMC is generally associated with the use of piezoelectric sensors to measure changes in stresses and strains of critical elements of important engineering structures. Regardless of the effectiveness of the SHMC systems no structure can lend itself well to PERR or remain seismically sustainable unless it has been designed specifically for the purpose, otherwise it would be disposable with no gains from the SHMC effort. A SS structure is one that can be designed to prevent actual collapse, overcome residual effects and lend itself well to PERR. All indications are that the use of multifunction design in conjunction with SHMC can lead to the evolution of viable SS archetypes. The purpose of the current article is to introduce a practical basis for efficient use of SHMC concepts in multi-objective earthquake resisting structures (ERSs). Replaceable energy dissipating moment connections (REDMC), rigid rocking cores (RRCs), high strength tendons, built-in stressing devices and support level grade beams have been introduced as natural instruments of structural control. The use of monitoring devices has been directed towards evaluation of the effects of formations or elimination of plastic hinges and the variations of the global drift of the system. The proposed methodologies impose and control the desired modes of lateral response and facilitate the PERR operations. Key words: Health monitoring; structural control; earthquakes; recentering; repairs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

95-114

Citation:

Online since:

February 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Housner, G.W., Bergman, L.A., Caughey T.K. Chassiakos, A.G., (1997),Structural Control: Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol.123, issue 9.

Google Scholar

[2] Cawley, P. (2018). Structural health monitoring: Closing the gap between research and industrial deployment. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921717750047.

Google Scholar

[3] Vallely, P., Papaelias, M, (2018) A Qualitative Comparison of Advantages and Disadvantages of Structural Health Monitoring of Railway Infrastructure over Conventional Inspection Methods, 12th European Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (ECNDT 2018), Gothenburg.

Google Scholar

[4] Yao, J. 1972. Concept of structural control. Journal of the Structural Division, 98.

Google Scholar

[5] Billie F. Spencer, M Nathan, Newmark, Satish Nagarajaiah. 2003. State of the Art of Structural Control. Journal of Structural Engineering 129(7),.

Google Scholar

[6] Karavasilis, T. L., Blakeborough, T. & Williams, M. S. 2011. Development of nonlinear analytical model and seismic analyses of a steel frame with self-centreing devices and viscoelastic dampers. Computers & structures, 89, 1232-1240.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.08.013

Google Scholar

[7] Lu, Y., and Panagiotou M. 2014. Earthquake Damage Resistant Multistory Buildings Using 7 Combination of Base Isolation and Rocking Core Walls, 1st Huixian International Forum on Earthquake Engineering, Harbin, China, August 16-19.

DOI: 10.1061/9780784479117.108

Google Scholar

[8] Ma, X., Borchers, E., Pena, A., Krawinkler, H. & Delerlien, G. 2010. Design and behaviour of steel shear plates with openings as energy-dissipating fuses. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Centre Technical Report.

Google Scholar

[9] Grigorian, M. & Grigorian, C. E. 2017. Sustainable earthquake-resisting system. Journal of Structural Engineering, 144, 04017199.

Google Scholar

[10] Bozkurt, M. B. & Topkaya, C. 2018. Replaceable links with gusseted brace joints for eccentrically braced frames. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 115, 305-318.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.08.035

Google Scholar

[11] Grigorian, M. & Grigorian, C. 2011. Performance control for seismic design of moment frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 67, 1106-1114.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.02.001

Google Scholar

[12] Grigorian, C. E., Grigorian, M. 2015. Performance control and efficient design of rocking-wall moment frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142, 04015139.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001411

Google Scholar

[13] Grigorian, M. 1993, On the Dynamic Analysis of Regular Shear Struvtures. Earthquake Spectra, Vol.9, N0 1 pp.55-64.

Google Scholar

[14] Wada, A., Qu, Z., Ito, H., Motoyui, S., Sakata, H., Kasai, K, 2012 Pin supported walls for enhancing the seismic behavior of building structures,, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41(14), 2075-20.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2175

Google Scholar

[15] McRae, G. A., Kimura, Y. & Roader, C. 2004. Effect of column stiffness on braced frame seismic behaviour. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130, 381-391.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:3(381)

Google Scholar

[16] Grigorian, M., Grigorian, C. 2016. An introduction to the structural design of rocking wall‐frames with a view to collapse prevention, self‐alignment and repairability. The structural design of tall and special buildings, 25, 93-111.

DOI: 10.1002/tal.1230

Google Scholar

[17] Mahin, S. (2008), Sustainable design considerations in earthquake engineering. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.

Google Scholar

[18] Kurama, Y., Sause, R., Pessiki, S., Lu, L., & El-Sheikh, M. (1998). Seismic design and response evaluation of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls, Precast Seismic Structural Systems Rep. Rep. No. 98, 3.

DOI: 10.15554/pci.rr.seis-017

Google Scholar

[19] Ajrab, J. J., Peckan, G.,Mander, J. B. 2004. Rocking wall–frame structures with supplemental tendon systems. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130, 895-903.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:6(895)

Google Scholar

[20] Grigorian, M., Kamizi, M. 2019 . High-performance resilient earthquake-resisting moment frames. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, 1-17.

DOI: 10.1680/jstbu.19.00109

Google Scholar

[21] Chancellor, N. B., Eatherton, M. R., Roke, D. A. & Akbas, T. 2014. Self-centreing seismic lateral force resisting systems: High performance structures for the city of tomorrow. Buildings, 4, 520-548.

DOI: 10.3390/buildings4030520

Google Scholar

[22] Janhunen, B., Tipping, S., Wolfe, J. & Mar, D. Seismic retrofit of a 1960s steel moment-frame high-rise using a pivoting spine. Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the Los Angeles tall buildings structural design council, (2012).

Google Scholar

[23] Lai, J.W., Mahin, S.A. 2015.Strongback system: A way to reduce damage to construction in steel –braced frames. ASCE, Journal of Structural Engineering.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001198

Google Scholar

[24] Deierlein, G. G., Ma, X., Eatherton, M., Hajjar, J., Krawinkler, H., & Takeuchi, T. (2009). Collaborative research on development of innovative steel braced frame systems with controlled rocking and replaceable fuses. Paper presented at the Proc. 6th International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo.

DOI: 10.1002/stco.201110023

Google Scholar

[25] Grigorian, M., Moghadam, A. S. & Kamizi, M. 2019 . On repairable earthquake resisting prototypes with a view to resiliency objectives and assisted self‐centreing. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 28, e1603.

DOI: 10.1002/tal.1603

Google Scholar

[26] AISC 341-10 (2010), AISC Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, AISC, Chicago, Illinois.US.

DOI: 10.1201/b11248-16

Google Scholar

[27] Grigorian M. Resiliency and post-earthquake realignment. Struct Design Tall Spec Build. 2021; e1836. https://doi. org/10.1002/tal.183.

DOI: 10.1002/tal.1836

Google Scholar

[28] Richards R.H, Gillett P.E, Kriegh and Lewis B.A (1980), The Analysis and Design of Single Plate Framing Connections, Engineering journal, AISC 1st Quarter.

Google Scholar

[29] Astaneh-Asl A, Call S.M. and McMullin K.M, (1989), Design of Single Plate Shear Connections Engineering journal, AISC 2nd Quarter, pp.21-31.

Google Scholar

[30] Eatherton, M. R., and Hajjar, J. F. 2011. Residual drifts of self-centering systems including effects of ambient building resistance., Earthquake Spectra, 27(3), 719–744.

DOI: 10.1193/1.3605318

Google Scholar

[31] Grigorian, M., Kamizi, M., Sedighi, S, 2021. A basis for developing sustainable earthquake –resisting structures. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.20.00053.

DOI: 10.1680/jstbu.20.00053

Google Scholar

[32] Eathertone, M. R., MA, X., Krawinkler, H., Deierlein, G. G. & Hajjar, J. F. 2014. Quasi-static cyclic behaviour of controlled rocking steel frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 140, 04014083.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001005

Google Scholar

[33] Grigorian, M., Moghadam, A. S., Mohammadi, H. & Kamizi, M. 2019. Methodology for developing earthquake‐resilient structures. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 28, e1571.

DOI: 10.1002/tal.1571

Google Scholar

[34] Naeim F. 2001. The Seismic Design Handbook, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, USA.

Google Scholar

[35] Astaneh-Asl, A., 1997 Seismic Design of Steel Column-Tree Moment-Resisting frames,, Steel Tips. Structural Steel Educational Council, Moraga, CA.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2003)129:9(1243)

Google Scholar

[36] Henry, R. S., S. Sritharan and J. M. Ingham (2009). An investigation of wall-to-floor interaction for buildings designed with self-centering precast wall systems. New Zealand Concrete Industries Conference, Rotorua, New Zealand.

Google Scholar

[37] Mahin, S .2017. Resilience by design: a structural engineering perspective. Proceedings of the 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile.

Google Scholar

[38] Christopoulos, C.; Filiatrault, A.; Folz, B. 2002, Seismic response of self-centering hysteretic SDOF systems. Earthquake. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31, 1131–1150. 29.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.152

Google Scholar

[39] Seo, C.Y.; Sause, R. Ductility demands on self-centering systems under earthquake loading. ACI Struct. J. 2005, 102, 275.

DOI: 10.14359/14279

Google Scholar

[40] Lee, S.S; Goel S.C. 2001. Performance-based design of steel moment frames using target drift and yield mechanisms,. Report No. UMCEE 01-17, Ann Arbor, MI: Dept. Civil Eng. Univ. MI.

Google Scholar

[41] Taranath, B. S. 1998. Steel, concrete, and composite design of tall buildings, McGraw-Hill.

Google Scholar

[42] Brandt, A. M. 1987. Criteria and methods of structural optimization, Kluwer Academic Publications, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

Google Scholar

[43] Grigorian M and Grigorian C (2012) Performance control: a new elastic plastic design procedure for earthquake resisting moment frames. Journal of the Structural Division 138(6): 812–821, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000515.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000515

Google Scholar