Decreasing Silica Scaling on Reverse Osmosis Membranes by Different Methods in Different Circumstances

Article Preview

Abstract:

Reverse osmosis (RO), the main technique for desalination, is affected by the quality of the water source. Natural water contains silica, which comes from metal silicates found in the earth's crust. Silica fouling is complicated to manage and often leads to less efficient designs of RO systems for safe operation. This research evaluates the current technologies for treating silica in RO desalination. The pilot project showed considerable water savings, achieving maximum recovery over the longest duration. To enhance water conservation, it is essential to optimize permeate recovery. Water savings were constrained due to silica scaling on the membranes. The chosen membranes can achieve a lower total dissolved solids (TDS) rejection than was required in the initial research, which could enhance water conservation. The additional energy needed for membrane treatment was balanced out by the savings in water costs. To avoid scaling, an antiscalant chemical along with a dosing system was installed next to the membrane system, and this study focused on three methods to mitigate silica scaling: Amonium Bifloride (ABF), a cation ion exchange column (IEX) containing Amberlite-IRC747 (Dupont) resins to eliminate multivalent cations like Ca2+, Mg2+, and Fe3+. Lastly, a simulated anti-scaling test was conducted using a feed solution that was pretreated by MIL-101(Fe) adsorption. Each type of antiscalant suitable for decreasing silica from water possesses distinct characteristics such as pH and other cations. Keywords:, Water conservation, Silica , Anti-Scalant, Amonium Bifloride (ABF), Exchange column (IEX) filled with Amberlite-IRC747 (Dupont), MIL-101(Fe).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

55-64

Citation:

Online since:

August 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Matson J, Harris, T (1979) Zero Discharge of Cooling Water by Side stream Softening. Water Pollution Control Federation 51: 2602–2614.

Google Scholar

[2] Cutler DS, DeanJ D, Daw JA, et al. (2019) Alternative Water Treatment Technologies for Cooling Tower Applications (No. NREL/TP-7A40-71845). National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States).

DOI: 10.2172/1219499

Google Scholar

[3] Jones R(1991) Waste water purification system.Wastewater Resources Inc, USA.

Google Scholar

[4] NRC (2008) Desalination A National Perspective. The National Academies Press, Washington D. C, United States.

Google Scholar

[5] Kumar P, Gupta P, Kumar S (2022) Comparing energy nexus efficiency of Energy Recovery Inc (ERI) over turbo pumps for cost saving of 12.6 MLD SWRO based desalination plant. Energy Nexus 5: 100015

DOI: 10.1016/j.nexus.2021.100015

Google Scholar

[6] Walton B (2010) The Price of Water: A Comparison of Water Rates. Usage in 30 U.S. Cities in, Circle of Blue.

Google Scholar

[7] Tan, M.; Fang, L.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, Y.; Meng, X.; Li, F. Synergistic inhibition effect and mechanism of polycation and polyanion on colloidal silica. Colloids Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 610, 125701.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125701

Google Scholar

[8] Rolf, J.; Cao, T.; Huang, X.; Boo, C.; Li, Q.; Elimelech, M. Inorganic Scaling in Membrane Desalination: Models, Mechanisms, and Characterization Methods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 7484–7511.

DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c01858

Google Scholar

[9] Bush, J.A.; Vanneste, J.; Cath, T.Y. Comparison of membrane distillation and high-temperature nanofiltration processes for treatment of silica-saturated water. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 570, 258–269.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.034

Google Scholar

[10] Jiang, A.; Wang, H.; Lin, Y.; Cheng, W.; Wang, J. A study on optimal schedule of membrane cleaning and replacement for spiral-wound SWRO system. Desalination 2017, 404, 259–269.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2016.11.025

Google Scholar

[11] Antony, A.; Low, J.H.; Gray, S.; Childress, A.E.; Le-Clech, P.; Leslie, G. Scale formation and control in high pressure membrane water treatment systems: A review. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 383, 1–16.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.08.054

Google Scholar

[12] Sheikholeslami R, Tan S. Effects of water quality on silica fouling of desalination plants. Desalination 1999; 126:267-280.

DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(99)00182-4

Google Scholar

[13] Koo T, Lee Y, Sheikholeslami R. Silica fouling and cleaning of reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2001;139: 43-56.

DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(01)00293-4

Google Scholar

[14] Alexander GB, W Heston, RK Iler. The solubility of amorphous silica in water. J. Phys. Chem. 1954; 58: 453-455.

DOI: 10.1021/j150516a002

Google Scholar

[15] Chan S. A review on solubility and polymerization of silica.Geothermics 1989;18:49-56. .

Google Scholar

[16] Tong T, Zhao S, Boo C, Hashmi SM, Elimelech M. Relating ilica scaling in reverse osmosis to membrane surface properties. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017;51:4396-4406. .

DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06411

Google Scholar

[17] Gabelich CJ, Chen WR, Yun TI, Coffey BM. The role of dissolved aluminum in silica chemistry for membrane processes. Desalination 2005;180:307-319.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.02.009

Google Scholar

[18] Zhao, X.L.; Zhao, J.; Sun, Y.Y.; Ouyang, H.; Chen, N.; Ren, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, S.; Yang, D.J.; Xing, B.S. Selenite capture by MIL-101(Fe) through Fe-O-Se bonds at free coordination Fe sites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127715.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127715

Google Scholar

[19] Wang, D.B.; Jia, F.Y.; Wang, H.; Chen, F.; Fang, Y.; Dong, W.B.; Zeng, G.M.; Li, X.M.; Yang, Q.; Yuan, X.Z. Simultaneously efficient adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline by Fe-based MOFs. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 519, 273–284.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.02.067

Google Scholar

[20] https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2019.353

DOI: 10.4491/eer.2019.353

Google Scholar