The Solubility of Indium in Liquid Gallium Supercooled to 12 K

Abstract:

The method of perturbed angular correlation (PAC) was used to determine lattice locations of ¹¹¹In impurity probe atoms present in extreme dilution in the intermetallic compound FeGa₃. In slightly Ga-poor samples, probes were found to strongly prefer one of two inequivalent Ga-sites. In slightly Ga-rich samples at room temperature, 293 K, the PAC spectrum exhibited an unperturbed quadrupole interaction signal that is consistent with indium probes dissolved in small liquid pools of the excess Ga. A myriad of such pools are probably located along grain boundaries in the sample. Cooling from 293 K down to 12 K, the site fraction of indium in liquid decreased, being offset by the increase in a signal attributed to indium solutes in precipitates with other impurities at the sides of the Ga pools. However, these changes were completely reversible upon heating, and no crystallization of the liquid gallium pools was observed down to 12 K. This is attributed to the extraordinarily small volumes for the pools, which, while not measured directly, are orders of magnitude smaller than cubic microns. The measured temperature dependence of the site fraction of indium in the liquid was used to extend the metastable solubility curve for indium in liquid gallium down to a temperature of 150 K, much lower than the eutectic temperature of Ga-In at 288.5 K.

• Periodical: Defect and Diffusion Forum (Volumes 323-325)
• Pages: 503-508
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.323-325.503
• Online since: April 2012
• Authors: Xiang Yu Yin, Gary Scott Collins
• Keywords: Gallium, Hyperfine Interaction, Metastable, Nuclear Quadrupole Interaction, Perturbed Angular Correlation (PAC), Site Preference, Solubility, Supercooling

References

[1] V.P. Skripov, Metastable Liquids (John Wiley, New York, 1973) pp.136-142.

[2] B. F. Borisov et al., J. Physics: Condens. Matter 11 (1999) pp.10259-10268.

[3] E.V. Charnaya et al., Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005) p.35406.

[4] A. Di Cicco et al., Europhys. Letters 27 (1994) pp.407-412.

[5] Matthew O. Zacate and Gary S. Collins, Physical Review B70 (2004) 24202.

[6] John P. Bevington, Farida Selim and Gary S. Collins, Hyperfine Interact. 177 (2007) pp.15-19.

[7] M.O. Zacate, A. Favrot and G.S. Collins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 22590; Gary S. Collins et al., Hyperfine Interact. 159 (2005) p.1; Gary S. Collins et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 155901.

[8] Egbert R. Nieuwenhuis, Matthew O. Zacate and Gary S. Collins, Defect and Diffusion Forum 264 (2007) 27-32.; Farida Selim, John P. Bevington and Gary S. Collins, Hyperfine Interact. 178 (2007) 87-90.

DOI: 10.1007/s10751-008-9663-3

[9] Gary S. Collins, Journal of Materials Science 42 (2007) 1915-(1919).

[10] Matthew O. Zacate and Gary S. Collins, Physical Review B69 (2004) 174202.

[11] Randal Newhouse, Prastuti Singh and Gary S. Collins (to be published).

[12] Perkin-Elmer, catalog number NEZ-304.

[13] C.E.T. White and H. Okamoto, eds. Phase diagrams of indium alloys and their engineering applications (ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, 1992) p.113.

[14] Günter Schatz and Alois Weidinger, Nuclear Condensed Matter Physics (Wiley, 1995).

[15] Ulrich Häussermann et al., J. Solid State Chemistry 165 (2002) pp.94-99.

[16] M. Menningen, H. Haas and H. Rinneberg, Phys. Rev. B 35 (1987) 8378.

[17] Xiangyu Yin and Gary S. Collins (to be published).