Ti-5Mo-xNb Alloys Obtained by Laser Deposition with Potential Use as Biomaterials

Article Preview

Abstract:

Titanium and its alloys could have good biocompatibility, suitable levels of strength, fracture toughness, fatigue resistance and low elastic modulus, which are requirements for metallic materials used as biomaterials. Implants of commercially available Ti alloys show excessive levels of stiffness that cause stress shielding and often lead to bone resorption and failure. For better biomechanical performance, it is necessary to redesign biomaterials with lower elastic modulus. Alloying Ti with β-stabilizing elements (Ta, Mo, Nb) allows obtaining alloys with Young´s modulus closer to that of bone (10-30 GPa), minimizing the tendency for stress shielding and bone resorption. A combinatorial method, based on variable composition laser deposition, has been used for synthesizing alloys with a gradient of composition along a single clad track and scanning for the most interesting compositions. This study reports results on laser synthesis of alloys in the Ti-5Mo-xNb system, in search for compositions with microstructure and properties optimized for use as biomaterials. The alloys were then characterized in composition and microstructure by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The mechanical properties were assessed using depth-sensing ultramicroindentation tests. Their microstructures consist of the orthorhombic α’ phase with martensitic morphology, and untransformed β. The alloys indentation hardness increased with the Nb content from 2.79 ± 0.02 GPa to 3.7 ± 0.8 GPa, due to solid solution strengthening. The same trend was observed in the elastic moduli that increased from 38.8 ± 8.1 GPa to 76 ± 13 GPa, and in addition the H/E ratio was greater than 0.04 for all samples which indicates good wear resistance. Despite being dual phase (α’+β) all compositions present elastic modulus that are considerably lower than those of commercial Ti alloys currently used (above 100 GPa).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

179-187

Citation:

Online since:

February 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Niinomi, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 483-484 (2008) 153–156.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Niinomi, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 33 (2002) 477-486.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Niinomi, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 243 (1998), 231-236.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Bronzino, Medical Devices and Systems, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1995.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Geetha, A.K. Singh, R. Asokamani, A.K. Gogia, Progress in Materials Science 54 (2009) 397-425.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004

Google Scholar

[6] J.A. Davidson, F.S. Georgette, Proc. Implant. Manuf. Mater. Technol, Society of Manufacturing Engineers. (1987) 122-126.

Google Scholar

[7] W.J. O`Brian, Dental Materials and Their Selection, Quintessence Books, Chicago 1997.

Google Scholar

[8] D. Kuroda, M. Niinomi, M. Morinaga, Y. Kato and T. Yashiro, Materials Science and Engineering A 243 (1998) 244-249.

Google Scholar

[9] C. M. Lee, C.-P. Ju, J.-H. Chern Lin, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 29 (2002) 314-322.

Google Scholar

[10] R. Vilar and R. Colaço, Surf. Coat. Technol. 203 (2009) 2878-2885.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Almeida, D. Gupta, C. Loable, R. Vilar, Mater. Sci. Eng. C 32 (2012) 1190-1195.

Google Scholar

[12] C. Loable, A. Almeida, R. Vilar, ICALEO 2012 – 31st International Congress on Applications of Lasers and Electro-Optics, Laser Institute of America, FL, EUA (CD-ROM, paper # 301)(2012) 72-78.

DOI: 10.2351/1.5062532

Google Scholar

[13] G. C. Cardoso, P. A. B. Kuroda, C. R. Grandini, Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 25 (2023) 3061.

Google Scholar

[14] J. Ling et al, Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 71 (2021) 201.

Google Scholar

[15] S. Ehtemam-Haghighi et al, Materials and Design, 111 (2016) 592.

Google Scholar