Optimization of Antibacterial properties of 316 Austenitic Stainless Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the present study, titanium dioxide (TiO2/Chitosan) nano-particles layer coatings were fabricated by electrophoretic deposition on 316 Austenitic Stainless steel substrate. Aims to enhance antibacterial properties by coating the surface with a bio ceramic (TiO2) nano-powders. TiO2, were made on 316 austenitic stainless steel substrate with an EPD (electrophoretic deposition) technique, charged particles suspended in ethanol at a concentration of 50 g/L, for each powder with ideal conditions of 20V and a deposition time of (2, 4 and 6 min). The surface tests of coated substrates, such as, micro-hardness, surface roughness and wettability antibacterial test were evaluated and compared to that of the uncoated substrates. The showed results the electrophoretic deposition is a favorable technique to make a bio coating on 316 Austenitic Stainless steel substrate with excellent properties and structure for applications biomedical. The results demonstrated that the coated sample under coating conditions (20V, 2min) which is close to the ratio found in living bone. the average micro-hardness of the TiO2 coated sample is 1483 HV compared with that of uncoated substrates is 460 HV. The results also of the wettability test showed that the contact angle of the deposited paint is 5.9 degrees, and this positive result is useful for biomedical applications and proved that the coating is hydrophilic.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

43-51

Citation:

Online since:

June 2024

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T Albrektsson, P.I. Brånemark, Hans-Arne Hansson and Lindström JJ, Osseo integrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man.52(2) (1981) pp.155-170.

DOI: 10.3109/17453678108991776

Google Scholar

[2] Osman, R.B. and M.V.J.M. Swain, A critical review of dental implant materials with an emphasis on titanium versus zirconia. Journal Materials (Basel), 2015. 8(3): pp.932-958.

DOI: 10.3390/ma8030932

Google Scholar

[3] Bedi, R.S., et al., Biocompatibility of corrosion-resistant zeolite coatings for titanium alloy biomedical implants. Acta Biomaterialia, 2009. 5(8): pp.3265-3271.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.019

Google Scholar

[4] L. Pawlowski; ״Thick Laser coatings: a review״; Journal of BiomaterialsVol.5, No.8, (1999) P. 279-295.

Google Scholar

[5] Karin Eufinger; ״Effect of deposition conditions and doping on the structure, optical properties and photocatalytic activity of d.c. magnetron sputtered TiO2 thin films״; Ph.D. thesis University of Wetenschappen: Natuurkunde, (2007).

Google Scholar

[6] MÜLLER E., DRAŠAR C., SCHILZ J., KAYSSER W.A., Functionally graded materials for sensor and energy applications, Materials Science and Engineering A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing A362(1-2),(2003) p.17–39.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(03)00581-1

Google Scholar

[7] Lu, L., Chekroun, M., Abraham, O., Maupin, V. and Villain, G., Mechanical properties estimation of functionally graded materials using surface waves recorded with a laser interferometer. NDT & E International, 44(2),( 2011) pp.169-177.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.11.007

Google Scholar

[8] Weikai Li and Baohong Han, Research and Application of Functionally Gradient Materials, Materials Science and Engineering, (2018).

Google Scholar

[9] Radhi N.S., Preparation, Characterization, and Modeling Functionally Graded Materials in Bio-application. PhD thesis. University of Technology. Iraq, (2015).

Google Scholar

[10] Craveiro, F., de Matos, J.M., Bártolo, H. and Bártolo, P., An innovation system for building manufacturing. In ASME 2012 11th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis (pp.175-179). American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2012 July.

DOI: 10.1115/esda2012-82772

Google Scholar

[11] Zhitomirsky, I. and L.J.J.o.M.S.M.i.M. Gal-Or, Electrophoretic Deposition of hydroxyapatite. Journal Mater Sci Mater Med. 8(4)( 1997) pp.213-219.

Google Scholar

[12] V. Khalili, J. Khalil-Allafi and H. Maleki Ghalen; ״Titanium oxide coating on NiTi shape memory substrate using electrophoretic deposition process״; International Journal of Engineering Vol.26, Vol.7(2013) P.707-712.

DOI: 10.5829/idosi.ije.2013.26.07a.05

Google Scholar

[13] Sorkhi, L., M. Farrokhi-Rad, and T.J.S. Shahrabi, Electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite–chitosan–titania on stainless steel 316 L. 2(3)( 2019) pp.458-467.

DOI: 10.3390/surfaces2030034

Google Scholar

[14] Mohamed Shatta, Magdy Badawy, and Diab Haddad, 'Surface Hardness Evaluation of A Thermoplastic Nylon Denture Base Material', Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science, Vol. 23 (2020) pp.343-346-

DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2020.129721

Google Scholar

[15] Kumar, R.R. and M.J.M.L. Wang, Functionally graded bioactive coatings of hydroxyapatite/titanium oxide composite system. Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 55(3) (2002) pp.133-137.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-577x(01)00635-8

Google Scholar

[16] A. Kocijan, M. Conradi and M. Hocevar, The influence of surface wettability and topography on the bioactivity of TiO2/Epoxy coatings on AISI 316L stainless steel, Materials, Vol. 12(2019) No. 11.

DOI: 10.3390/ma12111877

Google Scholar