On Porosity and Flexural Strength of FDM Parts Printed using Short Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polyamide 6 Filament

Abstract:

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) has several advantages, including design freedom, part customization, and ease of realizing complex geometries. However, there exist some challenges with the process; these include but are not limited to porosity, anisotropy, roughness, and material compatibility. This study is focussed on the additive manufacturing of polymer composites (short carbon fiber reinforced polyamide 6) through the process of FDM. Such 3D-printed parts are very lightweight and possess superior mechanical properties, which makes them a potential candidate for applications where a high strength-to-weight ratio is desired. The combination of FDM parameters, namely nozzle temperature, layer height, and flow rate, are studied in this work. The effect of variation in these parameters on the porosity and flexural strength is recorded following the Taguchi design of experiments. In calculating porosity, the weight difference between the printed part and the CAD part is used. For the flexural test, the standard three-point bending test is performed. The optimal combination of parametric settings is observed to be the same for minimum porosity and maximum flexural strength. Moreover, the flow rate is identified as a significant parameter for FDM printing of the composite material under study. The prints obtained at a raster angle 0˚/90˚ and on-edge orientation are observed to have better flexural strength than the prints at a raster angle ±45˚ and flat orientation.

• Periodical: Engineering Headway (Volume 22)
• Pages: 11-19
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-hWCJw4
• Online since: June 2025
• Authors: Sudhanshu Gangwar, Shuja Ahmed*
• Keywords: Additive Manufacturing, Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer, Flexural Strength, Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), Polyamide 6, Porosity

References

[1] A.A. Rosli, R.K. Shuib, K.M.K. Ishak, Z.A.A. Hamid, M.K. Abdullah, A. Rusli, Influence of bed temperature on warpage, shrinkage and density of various acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) parts from fused deposition modelling (FDM), AIP Conf. Proc. 2267(1) (2020) 020072

DOI: 10.1063/5.0015799

[2] S. Guessasma, W. Zhang, J. Zhu, S. Belhabib, H. Nouri, Challenges of additive manufacturing technologies from an optimisation perspective, Int. J. Simul. Multidiscip. Des. Optim. 6 (2015) A9 1-13

DOI: 10.1051/smdo/2016001

[3] O.A. Mohamed, S.H. Masood, J.L. Bhowmik, Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects, Adv. Manuf. 3 (2015) 42-53

DOI: 10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7

[4] M.K. Thompson, G. Moroni, T. Vaneker, G. Fadel, R.I. Campbell, I. Gibson, A. Bernard, J. Schulz, P. Graf, B. Ahuja, F. Martina, Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints, CIRP Ann. 65(2) (2016) 737-760

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004

[5] G. Moroni, W.P. Syam, S. Petrò, Functionality-based part orientation for additive manufacturing, Proc. CIRP 36 (2015) 217-222.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.015

[6] W. Gao, Y. Zhang, D. Ramanujan, K. Ramani, Y. Chen, C.B. Williams, C.C. Wang, Y.C. Shin, S. Zhang, P.D. Zavattieri, The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering, Comput. Aided Des. 69 (2015) 65-89.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001

[7] A.N. Dickson, H.M. Abourayana, D.P. Dowling, 3D printing of fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused filament fabrication – A review, Polym. 12(10) (2020) 2188.

DOI: 10.3390/POLYM12102188

[8] P. Zhuo, S. Li, I.A. Ashcroft, A.I. Jones, Material extrusion additive manufacturing of continuous fibre reinforced polymer matrix composites: A review and outlook, Compos. B Eng. 224 (2021) 109143.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109143

[9] H. Mei, Z. Ali, Y. Yan, I. Ali, L. Cheng, Influence of mixed isotropic fiber angles and hot press on the mechanical properties of 3D printed composites, Addit. Manuf. 27 (2019) 150-158.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.008

[10] G. Liu, Y. Xiong, L. Zhou, Additive manufacturing of continuous fiber reinforced polymer composites: Design opportunities and novel applications, Compos. Commun. 27 (2021) 100907.

DOI: 10.1016/j.coco.2021.100907

[11] M. Khorasani, A. Ghasemi, B. Rolfe, I. Gibson, Additive manufacturing a powerful tool for the aerospace industry, Rapid Prototyp. J. 28(1) (2022) 87-100.

DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-01-2021-0009

[12] S. Sharafi, M.H. Santare, J. Gerdes, S.G. Advani, A review of factors that influence the fracture toughness of extrusion-based additively manufactured polymer and polymer composites, Addit. Manuf. 38 (2021) 101830.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101830

[13] I.J. Solomon, P. Sevvel, J.J.M.T.P. Gunasekaran, A review on the various processing parameters in FDM, Mater. Today Proc. 37 (2021) 509-514.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.484

[14] L. Auffray, P.A. Gouge, L. Hattali, Design of experiment analysis on tensile properties of PLA samples produced by fused filament fabrication, J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 118 (2022) 4123-4137.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-08216-7

[15] R. Shuto, S. Norimatsu, D.D. Arola, R. Matsuzaki, Effect of the nozzle temperature on the microstructure and interlaminar strength in 3D printing of carbon fiber/polyphenylene sulfide composites, Compos. C Open Access 9 (2022) 100328.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomc.2022.100328

[16] S. Nathaphan, W. Trutassanawin, Effects of process parameters on compressive property of FDM with ABS, Rapid Prototyp. J. 27(5) (2021) 905-917.

DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-12-2019-0309

[17] M. Algarni, S. Ghazali, Comparative study of the sensitivity of PLA, ABS, PEEK, and PETG's mechanical properties to FDM printing process parameters, Cryst. 11(8) (2021) 995.

DOI: 10.3390/cryst11080995

[18] Z. Zhang, D. Yavas, Q. Liu, D. Wu, Effect of build orientation and raster pattern on the fracture behavior of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites fabricated by additive manufacturing, Addit. Manuf. 47 (2021) 102204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102204

[19] I.M. Alarifi, A performance evaluation study of 3d printed nylon/glass fiber and nylon/carbon fiber composite materials, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 21 (2022) 884-892.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.09.085

[20] Z. Yang, Z. Yang, H. Chen, W. Yan, 3D printing of short fiber reinforced composites via material extrusion: Fiber breakage, Addit. Manuf. 58 (2022) 103067.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2022.103067

[21] N. Magino, J. Köbler, H. Andrä, F. Welschinger, R. Müller, M. Schneider, A space-time upscaling technique for modeling high-cycle fatigue-damage of short-fiber reinforced composites, Compos. Sci. Technol. 222 (2022) 109340.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109340

[22] Y. Abderrafai, M.H. Mahdavi, F. Sosa-Rey, C. Hérard, I.O. Navas, N. Piccirelli, M. Lévesque, D. Therriault, Additive manufacturing of short carbon fiber-reinforced polyamide composites by fused filament fabrication: Formulation, manufacturing and characterization, Mater. Des. 214 (2022) 110358.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110358