The Role of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Biosecurity Risk Management

Article Preview

Abstract:

Technological advancements in data acquisition using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly applied in biosecurity, particularly for monitoring forest plantations like Eucalyptus pellita. This research has two objectives, i.e. to compare the challenges in obtaining accurate information on Industrial Forest Plantation plants and to provide an overview of the efforts made in solving this problem and the optimal results of the information obtained.The method used in the research is to conduct a Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, and Threat (SWOT) assessment on the utilization of UAVs in biosecurity development and focus on (1) Leaf Disease Severity Detection, (2) Crown Density Modelling, (3) CHM for Individual Tree Detection (4) DBH Estimation Modelling (5) Large Scale Acquisition Procedures. Strengths of UAVs include their ability to provide fast, efficient, and highly accurate data for early detection of plant diseases and pests. Weaknesses from UAVs’ reliance on favorable weather conditions. Opportunities exist in integrating UAV data with advanced analytical methods to improve biosecurity. Rapid technological advancements can become a threat as they compel organizations to continuously upgrade equipment, while widespread UAV use may raise legal and ethical concerns, including privacy and regulatory challenges. However, UAV can be a technological instrument for implementing biosecurity risk management.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Engineering Headway (Volume 27)

Pages:

586-594

Citation:

Online since:

October 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] FAO. Biosecurity Principles and Components. Part. 1. In FAO Biosecurity Toolkit; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2007, p.1–20. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/a1140e/a1140e.pdf (accessed on October 20th 2024).

DOI: 10.2172/1329289

Google Scholar

[2] Renault, V., Humblet, M. F., & Saegerman, C. Biosecurity concept: Origins, evolution and perspectives. Animals, 12(1), 63. (2021).

DOI: 10.3390/ani12010063

Google Scholar

[3] Liao, K., Yang, F., Dang, H., Wu, Y., Luo, K., & Li, G. Detection of Eucalyptus Leaf Disease with UAV Multispectral Imagery. Forests, 13(8). (2022).

DOI: 10.3390/f13081322

Google Scholar

[4] Hansen, M., P. P., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., & Townshend, J. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century Forest Cover Change. Science, 850-853. (2013).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1244693

Google Scholar

[5] Lei, S., Luo, J., Tao, X., & Qiu, Z. (2021). Remote Sensing Detecting of Yellow Leaf Disease of Arecanut Based on UAV Multisource Sensors. Remote Sensing, 13(22).

DOI: 10.3390/rs13224562

Google Scholar

[6] Stone, C., & Mohammed, C. (2017). Application of Remote Sensing Technologies for Assessing Planted Forests Damaged by Insect Pests and Fungal Pathogens: a Review. Current Forestry Reports, 3(2), 75–92.

DOI: 10.1007/s40725-017-0056-1

Google Scholar

[7] Matese, A., Di Gennaro, S. F., & Berton, A. Assessment of a Canopy Height Model (CHM) in a vineyard using UAV-based multispectral imaging. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 38(8-10), 2150-2160. (2017).

DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2016.1226002

Google Scholar

[8] Ramalho de Oliveira, L. F., Lassiter, H. A., Wilkinson, B., Whitley, T., Ifju, P., Logan, S. R., & Martin, T. A. Moving to automated tree inventory: Comparison of uas-derived lidar and photogrammetric data with manual ground estimates. Remote Sensing, 13(1), 72. (2020).

DOI: 10.3390/rs13010072

Google Scholar

[9] Hematang, F., Murdjoko, A., & Hendri, H. Model Pendugaan Diameter Pohon Berbasis Citra Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Pada Hutan Hujan Tropis Papua: Studi Di Pulau Mansinam Papua Barat (Model of Tree Diameter Estimation Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Image in Papua Tropical Rain Forest: a Study in Mansinam Island Papua Barat). Jurnal Penelitian Kehutanan Faloak, 5(1), 16–30. (2021).

DOI: 10.20886/jpkf.2021.5.1.16-30

Google Scholar

[10] Dell, M., Stone, C., Osborn, J., Glen, M., McCoull, C., Rimbawanto, A., Tjahyono, B., & Mohammed, C. Detection of necrotic foliage in a young Eucalyptus pellita plantation using unmanned aerial vehicle RGB photography–a demonstration of concept. Australian Forestry, 82(2), 79–88. (2019).

DOI: 10.1080/00049158.2019.1621588

Google Scholar

[11] Tuominen, J., Lipping, T., Kuosmanen, V., & Haapanen, R. Remote Sensing of Forest Health. Geoscience and remote sensing, 29-52. (2009).

DOI: 10.5772/8283

Google Scholar

[12] Aji, Dito Seno, & LM Sabri LM Sabri. Analisis Akurasi Dem Dan Foto Tegak Hasil Pemotretan Dengan Pesawat Nir Awak DJI Phantom 4 (Studi Kasus: Bukit Perumahan Permata Hijau Tembalang Semarang). Jurnal Geodesi Undip, 8(2), 8-18. (2019).

DOI: 10.24014/jej.v5i2.37822

Google Scholar

[13] Dandois, Jonathan P., Marc Olano, & Erle C. Ellis. Optimal altitude, overlap, and weather conditions for computer vision UAV estimates of forest structure. Remote sensing, 7(10). (2015)

DOI: 10.3390/rs71013895

Google Scholar

[14] Yang, Yuan, Yongjiang Huang, Haoran Yang, Tingting Zhang, Zixuan Wang, and Xixiang Liu. "Real-time terrain-following of an autonomous quadrotor by multi-sensor fusion and control."Applied Sciences 11(3). (2021).

DOI: 10.3390/app11031065

Google Scholar

[15] Dash, J. P., Watt, M. S., Pearse, G. D., Heaphy, M., & Dungey, H. S. Assessing very high resolution UAV imagery for monitoring forest health during a simulated disease outbreak. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 131, 1–14. (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.07.007

Google Scholar