Exploring the Application of Computer-Aided Design in Structural Designs for Sustainable Infrastructure Projects

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study explores the role of Computer-Aided Design (CAD) in advancing sustainable structural design, focusing on a portal frame warehouse as a case study. As construction demands shift towards sustainability, CAD tools such as AutoCAD, ProtaStructure, and Tekla Structures offer enhanced precision, design optimization, and material efficiency. The research compares manual method and CAD-based approaches in designing a 20 m × 50 m steel portal frame warehouse, following BS 5950 standards. The portar frame design involved manually analysing loads, selecting sections, and designing columns, base plates, and footings, while CAD softwares performed 3D modelling and automatic code checks. After the analysis and design, 203×203×46 UC (276 kg) was obtained at a rate of ₦331,200/section for manual approach, while with CAD approach, 254×254×73 UB (438 kg) at a rate of ₦525,600/section was obtained. However, for the footing. 0.216 m³ at ₦9,720 was obtained for manual approach, while 0.8 m³ at ₦23,040 was obtained for CAD approach. In total, for a section, manual design will cost ₦653,398 while CAD design cost will ₦864,814. It is recommended that CAD-based design should be prioritized for large-scale or safety-critical infrastructure due to its precision, efficiency, and compliance with modern codes. For smaller or budget-limited projects, a hybrid approach combining manual and CAD methods is suggested. Investment in CAD training and software can drive long-term sustainability and structural resilience.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Engineering Headway (Volume 33)

Pages:

299-306

Citation:

Online since:

February 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C. Eastman, P. Teicholz, R. Sacks, and K. Liston, BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley (2011)

DOI: 10.1002/9780470261309

Google Scholar

[2] D. Jones and T. Lane, The Practical Guide to AutoCAD in Construction Design. London: Pearson Education (2013)

Google Scholar

[3] M. Kelleher, Sustainable Design and Construction Using BIM Tools. J. Green Building, (2019) 14(1), 105–117.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Azhar, M. Khalfan and T. Maqsood, Building information modeling (BIM): now and beyond. Constr. Econ. and Bdg., 12(4), (2018) 15–28.

DOI: 10.5130/ajceb.v12i4.3032

Google Scholar

[5] B. Hwang and W. J. Ng, Project Management for Green Construction: Challenges, Solutions and Opportunities. Int. J. of Proj. Mgt., 31(2), (2019) 272–284.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Rockström, W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F. S. Chapin III, E. F. Lambin, T. M. Lenton, M. Scheffer, C. Folke, H. J. Schellnhuber and B. Nykvist, A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature, 461(7263), (2017) 472–475.

DOI: 10.1038/461472a

Google Scholar

[7] L. Ding, Y. Zhou and B. Akinci, Building Information Modeling for Construction Safety Management: A Review. Aut. in Constr., 96 (2017) 434–449.

Google Scholar

[8] R. Oxman, Theory and Design in the First Digital Age. Design Studies, 52 (2017) 4–39.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Mansour, J. Fiksel and A. Basu, The Path to Sustainability: Resilience in Industrial Ecosystems. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 11 (2021)11–25.

Google Scholar

[10] G. P. Luth, B. R. Schwegler and R. T. Shilcrat, Putting Construction Engineering and Management Back on the Map. J. of Constr. Eng. and Mgt., 140 (5), (2014) 1–7.

Google Scholar

[11] R. Sacks, U. Gurevich, V. Kalganova and T. Oron-Gilad, Modeling and Measuring Design Information Quality in BIM-based Design. Automation in Construction, (2018) 92, 292–306.

Google Scholar

[12] CESDb, AutoCAD - Description and Capabilities. [online] Civil Engineering Software Database. Available at: https://www.cesdb.com/autocad.html [Accessed 12 June 2025] (2016).

Google Scholar

[13] Civil Engineers World, Comparison Between Manual and Computer-Aided Design (CAD) in Structural Engineering. [online] Available at: www.civilengineersworld.com [Accessed 12 June 2025], (2020).

Google Scholar

[14] CESDb, Tekla Structures - Overview and Features. [online] Civil Engineering Software Database. Available at: https://www.cesdb.com/tekla-structures.html [Accessed 12 June 2025] (2020).

Google Scholar

[15] Prota Software, ProtaStructure Suite Overview. [online] Available at: https://www.protasoftware.com [Accessed 12 June 2025] (2020).

Google Scholar

[16] Prota Software, ProtaStructure 2024 Features. [online] Available at: https://www.protasoftware.com [Accessed 12 June 2025] (2024).

Google Scholar

[17] Trimble Solutions, Tekla Structures for Structural Engineering. [online] Available at: https://www.tekla.com [Accessed 12 June 2025] (2020).

Google Scholar