OHS Performance Assessment on Production Floor at PT. XYZ

Article Preview

Abstract:

PT. XYZ is a company that produces plywood, which in the production process uses many machines and equipment that have high potential hazards if not controlled. Key performance indicator (KPI) is a performance indicator measuring a length, processing time, tool life, and a measure of performance needed. The method used to normalize the value is Snorm De Boer (SNORM), where the lowest value will be given a value of 0 and the highest value will be given a value of 100. The purpose of this research is to measure the OSH performance on the production floor of PT. XYZ and could provide improvement suggestions for OSH performance on the production floor at PT. XYZ based on the level of value obtained. The results: total value of OSH performance in rotary area is 21.00, press dryer area is 43.91, repair area is 60.59, glue spreader area is 56.61, cold press area is 47.08, hot press area is 55.76, sander calibration area is 48.57, sizer area is 69.86 and sander finish goods area is 84.25. The rotary area has the lowest OSH performance value because there is a process that has a high risk of work accidents but is not accompanied by OSH supporting facilities from the company. The proposed improvement of this research is cultivating the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), administrative control which includes policies, SOP, safety sign, work and safety training, regular inspection and maintenance, and applicate 5S, also engineering control by creating a special soundproof room for machines with high noise levels.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Engineering Headway (Volume 6)

Pages:

267-278

Citation:

Online since:

April 2024

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Setyarso R. Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja itu Penting. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/. 2020.

Google Scholar

[2] Wahyuni N, Suyadi B, Hartanto W. Pengaruh keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja (K3) terhadap produktivitas kerja karyawan pada PT. Kutai Timber Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Sosial. 2018; 12(1): 99– 104.

DOI: 10.19184/jpe.v12i1.7593

Google Scholar

[3] Endroyo B. Faktor-faktor yang berperan terhadap peningkatan sikap keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja (k3) para pelaku jasa konstruksi di semarang. Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan. 2010;12(2).

DOI: 10.24815/jarsp.v1i4.12463

Google Scholar

[4] Dipura S, Soediantono D. Benefits of Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and Proposed Applications in the Defense Industry: A Literature Review. International Journal of Social and Management Studies. 2022;3(4):23–33.

Google Scholar

[5] Firdaus H, Midyanti DM, Mutiah N. Pengukuran Kinerja Supply Chain Perum Bulog Divisi Regional Kalimantan Barat Menggunakan Supply Chain Operation Reference (SCOR). Coding Jurnal Komputer dan Aplikasi. 2020;8(3):19–28.

DOI: 10.26418/coding.v8i3.42414

Google Scholar

[6] Luckyta DT, Partiwi SG. Evaluasi dan Perancangan Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (SMK3) dalam Rangka Perbaikan Safety Behaviour Pekerja (Studi Kasus: PT. X, Sidoarjo). Jurnal Teknik ITS. 2012;1(1):A510–4.

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/gjnzx

Google Scholar

[7] Najihah K, Silaban G, Zulgendri Z. Pelaksanaan Serta Pemantauan Evaluasi Kinerja K3 Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kejadian Kecelakaan Kerja di PTPN III Tebing Tinggi Tahun 2017. Pena Medika Jurnal Kesehatan. 2019;8(1):43–53.

DOI: 10.33085/jkg.v2i1.4071

Google Scholar

[8] Marsel C. Pengaruh Program Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) dan Disiplin Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan di PT. (P&P) Lembah Karet Kota Padang. UNP; 2022.

DOI: 10.36563/jimbien.v1i2.590

Google Scholar

[9] Gustiawan S. Analisa Kesehatan Dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3) Pada Pelaksanaan Proyek Pembangunan The Concepts Boutique Office Di Samarinda. KURVA MAHASISWA. 2014; 4(1): 82–99.

DOI: 10.30595/civeng.v1i2.9298

Google Scholar

[10] Bernard M. Key Performance Indicator yang Harus Diketahui. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo. 25AD

Google Scholar

[11] Rica YS, Pujawan IIN, ENg M. Pengukuran Kinerja Supply Chain Berbasis SNI ISO 9001: 2008 dengan Pendekatan SCOR (Studi Kasus: Baristand Industri Surabaya). J Teknol Proses dan Inov Ind. 2016;1(2):65–71.

DOI: 10.36048/jtpii.v1i2.1989

Google Scholar

[12] Ramadhani N, Rini WNE. Kajian Identifikasi Bahaya, Analisis RisikoDan Pengendalian Bahaya Di PT. X Tahun 2021. An-Nadaa: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat (e-Journal). 2021;8(2):168–79.

DOI: 10.31602/ann.v8i2.5105

Google Scholar

[13] Putri KDS, Denny Y. Analisis faktor yang berhubungan dengan kepatuhan menggunakan alat pelindung diri. The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety, Health and Environment. 2014;1(1):24–36.

DOI: 10.20473/ijosh.v6i3.2017.311-320

Google Scholar

[14] Rahayu FD. Hubungan Antara Keselamatan Kerja Dengan Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan. Jurnal Psikologi: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan. 2018;5(2):58–64.

DOI: 10.35891/jip.v10i1.3710

Google Scholar

[15] Salafudin M, Ananta H, Subiyanto S. Implementasi Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja di PT PLN (Persero) Area Pengatur Distribusi Jawa Tengah & DI Yogyakarta dalam Upaya Peningkatan Mutu dan Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan. Jurnal Teknik Elektro. 2013;5(1).

DOI: 10.30659/jp.14.2.139-150

Google Scholar

[16] Gorman T, Dropkin J, Kamen J, Nimbalkar S, Zuckerman N, Lowe T, et al. Controlling health hazards to hospital workers: A reference guide. NEW SOLUTIONS: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy. 2014;23(1_suppl):1–169.

DOI: 10.2190/ns.23.suppl

Google Scholar

[17] Prayitno H. Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) pada Standard Operasional Prosedur (SOP). 2016.

Google Scholar

[18] Alfidyani KS, Lestantyo D, Wahyuni I. Hubungan pelatihan K3, penggunaan APD, pemasangan safety sign, dan penerapan sop dengan terjadinya risiko kecelakaan kerja (Studi pada industri garmen kota Semarang). Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat (Undip).2020;8(4):478-83.

DOI: 10.14710/jkm.v9i6.31343

Google Scholar

[19] Sulaiman Z. SAFETY SIGN (Studi Analitik pada Pekerja Bagian Coal Handling di Unit PLTU Barru Tahun 2018). Jurnal Mitrasehat. 2019;9(2).

DOI: 10.51171/jms.v9i2.40

Google Scholar

[20] Mirza MN. Implementation of the 5S and K3 Programs in The Vocational High School Environment: Community Service as an Effort to Increase Learning Safety and Productivity. Asian Journal of Community Services. 2023;2(2):217–24.

DOI: 10.55927/ajcs.v2i2.3206

Google Scholar

[21] Utami AF. Desain Tempat Kerja Berbasis Engineering Control Sebagai Pengendalian Covid-19. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat (Undip). 2022;10(1):58–64.

DOI: 10.14710/jkm.v10i1.31735

Google Scholar