Comparative Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Robot Chassis Using Structural Steel and Aluminium Alloy Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

This work presents a comparative finite element analysis of a 3-wheeler novel robot chassis used for uneven terrain robot applications. The chassis was modeled using SolidWorks and further analyzed in Ansys for its total deformation, equivalent stress, equivalent elastic strain and thermal strain. Two materials were taken into consideration for comparative analysis: Aluminium alloy and Structural steel. A load (force) of 500 N was distributed on the chassis uniformly and an acceleration of 5 mm/sec2 was given. Thermal conditions were added by raising the temperature from 22°C to 50°C in 1 sec. The analysis performed was majorly divided into three parts: a) Only considering force, b) Considering force as well as acceleration, c) Considering force, acceleration and thermal conditions. Total deformation in Aluminium alloy was observed 1.51 to 2.79 times that of structural steel in all the cases. Both metals exhibited almost identical equivalent stress in absence of thermal effect and structural steel exhibit 1.5 times that of Aluminium alloy at elevated temperature. Aluminium alloy possess relatively more (1.86-2.63 times) equivalent elastic strain compared to structural steel. Although, distribution of thermal strain remained constant throughout the chassis for both the materials, its magnitude was 1.91 times high in Aluminium alloy. This type of analysis helps in evaluating the current design and decide whether it will sustain the required load and acceleration under given thermal conditions

You have full access to the following eBook
You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Muthiah, G. Karthick, M. Kalimuthu, K. Muthusamy, C. Kanagaraj, Modal Analysis of Chassis Using CAE Prediction, International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering. 7(11) (2021) 40-43. https://ijste.org/Article.php?manuscript=IJSTEV7I11013

Google Scholar

[2] Vishwakarma, A. Prajapati, S. Mahadeokar, A. Vishwakarma, Design & Analysis of Truck Chassis Frame using CAE Tools, International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science. 3(9) (2021) 756-761. https://www.irjmets.com/uploadedfiles/paper/volume_3/issue_9_september_2021/16172/final/fin_irjmets1631798148.pdf

DOI: 10.56726/irjmets35193

Google Scholar

[3] M.V. Chugunov, I.N. Polunina, A.G. Divin, et al. Integrated Mobile Robotic Platform Model, Engineering Technologies and Systems. 31(4) (2021) 609-627

DOI: 10.15507/2658-4123.031.202104.609-627

Google Scholar

[4] S. Jawadekar, P. Balgaonkar, CAE simulations for an Optimal & Cost-effective Automotive Chassis Design, https://www.itcinfotech.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/CAE-Simulations-For-An-Optimal-Cost-Effective-Automotive-Chassis-Design.pdf

Google Scholar

[5] N. Demir, H.S. Sucuoglu, I. Bogrekci, P. Demircioglu, Structural & Dynamic Analyses and Simulation of Mobile Transportation Robot, Int. J. of 3D Printing Tech. Dig. Ind., 5(3) (2021) 587- 595

DOI: 10.46519/ij3dptdi.949803

Google Scholar

[6] Zhou Jian, Yang ZhiMin, Chen Song Lin, Analysis of the harvesting robot arm modal based on CAE, Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 6(11) (2014) 669-673. https://www.jocpr.com/articles/analysis-of-the-harvesting-robot-arm-modal-based-on-cae.pdf

Google Scholar

[7] J. Ze, C. Bo, Z. Ju, Y. Li, Y. Xu, Y. Zhao, Design and analysis of a wall-climbing robot for water wall inspection of thermal power plants, Journal of Field Robotics, (2023), https://doi.org/

DOI: 10.1002/rob.22171

Google Scholar

[8] H.S. Lee, S.L. Chang, Development of a CAD/CAE/CAM system for a robot manipulator, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 140 (2003) 100–104. https://doi.org/

DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00695-2

Google Scholar

[9] H. Jiang, B. Yu, X. Qi, C. Pan and J. Yang, Structural Design and Simulation Analysis of Quadruped Tree Climbing Robot, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, (2023) 2437-012116. DOI: 0.1088/1742-6596/2437/1/012116

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2437/1/012116

Google Scholar

[10] A.S. Agbadua, C.C. Obinwa, E.A. Agbomabinu, S.O. Sheidu and M.I. Joseph, Verification of Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) in Optimization of Chassis for Tricycle, International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering, 6(3) (2016) 98-102

Google Scholar

[11] S. Kakria, and D. Singh, CAE Analysis, Optimization and Fabrication of Formula SAE Vehicle Structure, SAE Technical Paper. 2015-01-0072, (2015).

DOI: 10.4271/2015-01-0072

Google Scholar

[12] M.H. Korayem, N. Shiehbeiki and T. Khanali, Design, manufacturing, and experimental tests of a prismatic robot for assembly line, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 29 (2006) 379–388

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-005-2524-1

Google Scholar

[13] W. Hai-fei, J. Kun-kun and G. Zi-peng, Random vibration analysis for the chassis frame of hydraulic truck based on ANSYS, Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 6(3) (2014) 849-852. https://www.jocpr.com/articles/random-vibration-analysis-for-the-chassis-frame-of-hydraulic-truck-based-on-ansys.pdf

DOI: 10.1109/cinc.2010.5643716

Google Scholar

[14] J.J. Gumasing, Overall Improvement for the Design of Motorized Tricycles in the Philippines - An Ergonomic Study, Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Bali, Indonesia. (2014) 1509-1517.

Google Scholar

[15] Y.S. Rajput, V. Sharma, S. Sharma & G. Saxena, A Vibration Analysis of Vehicle Frame, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 3(2) (2013) 348-350.

Google Scholar

[16] K.Y. Patil and E.R. Deore, Stress Analysis of Ladder Chassis with Various Cross Sections, International Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 10(4) (2015) 111-116.

Google Scholar